On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 02:09:52PM +0400, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
>
> If it's still possible to change this option, please do it.
> Checkpointing is now working fine, it's totally our fault that we forgot
> to switch the relative option.
>
> So, please set CONFIG_VZ_CHECKPOINT=m. From the ABI point of view this
> adds two new ioctl()s for /dev/vzctl, nothing more.
thanks kir and pavel for input.
did a build test and abicheck went positive like according your
statements. so enabled it for 2.6.26-6. as 2.6.26-5 upload happened
today can't say for sure when this will land. depends mostly on
next upstream stable release. will see to get it into Lenny.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
09-10-2008, 12:57 PM
maximilian attems
Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.26-5
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Thorsten Schifferdecker wrote:
> since you add upstream OpenVZ fixes up to git commit 0f14912e3d2251aff,
> Checkpointing work if enabled if enabled in feature-set/openvz/config,
> but a bug existes in 2.6.24 and 2.6.26, chkpnt with a sit device doesnt
> work, see http://bugzilla.openvz.org/874
can i have an bug report with severity important against linux-2.6
so that the commited checkpoint enabling really lands in lenny?
thanks
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
09-10-2008, 05:28 PM
Ola Lundqvist
Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.26-5
Hi
I have filed an important bug now. It should enter the bug archive
shortly.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 02:57:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Thorsten Schifferdecker wrote:
>
> > since you add upstream OpenVZ fixes up to git commit 0f14912e3d2251aff,
> > Checkpointing work if enabled if enabled in feature-set/openvz/config,
> > but a bug existes in 2.6.24 and 2.6.26, chkpnt with a sit device doesnt
> > work, see http://bugzilla.openvz.org/874
>
> can i have an bug report with severity important against linux-2.6
> so that the commited checkpoint enabling really lands in lenny?
>
> thanks
>
> --
> maks
> _______________________________________________
> Debian mailing list
> Debian@openvz.org
> https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/debian
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
09-10-2008, 07:12 PM
Ola Lundqvist
Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.26-5
Hi again
The bug id is now #498510.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 07:28:18PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have filed an important bug now. It should enter the bug archive
> shortly.
>
> Best regards,
>
> // Ola
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 02:57:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Thorsten Schifferdecker wrote:
> >
> > > since you add upstream OpenVZ fixes up to git commit 0f14912e3d2251aff,
> > > Checkpointing work if enabled if enabled in feature-set/openvz/config,
> > > but a bug existes in 2.6.24 and 2.6.26, chkpnt with a sit device doesnt
> > > work, see http://bugzilla.openvz.org/874
> >
> > can i have an bug report with severity important against linux-2.6
> > so that the commited checkpoint enabling really lands in lenny?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > --
> > maks
> > _______________________________________________
> > Debian mailing list
> > Debian@openvz.org
> > https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/debian
> >
>
> --
> --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
> / opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37
> | ola@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD |
> | http://inguza.com/ +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
> gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Debian mailing list
> Debian@openvz.org
> https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/debian
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
09-10-2008, 07:17 PM
Mert Dirik
Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.26-5
maximilian attems wrote:
>
> did a build test and abicheck went positive like according your
> statements. so enabled it for 2.6.26-6. as 2.6.26-5 upload happened
> today can't say for sure when this will land. depends mostly on
> next upstream stable release. will see to get it into Lenny.
>
Thank you very much!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
09-10-2008, 07:42 PM
Kir Kolyshkin
Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.26-5
maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 02:09:52PM +0400, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
If it's still possible to change this option, please do it.
Checkpointing is now working fine, it's totally our fault that we forgot
to switch the relative option.
So, please set CONFIG_VZ_CHECKPOINT=m. From the ABI point of view this
adds two new ioctl()s for /dev/vzctl, nothing more.
thanks kir and pavel for input.
did a build test and abicheck went positive like according your
statements. so enabled it for 2.6.26-6. as 2.6.26-5 upload happened
today can't say for sure when this will land. depends mostly on
next upstream stable release. will see to get it into Lenny.
Thanks a lot Max!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.26-5
