FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Debian > Debian KDE

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 08-10-2012, 10:19 AM
Martin Albrecht
 
Default bug 675151: kmail vs akonadi?

Hi,

I tried - unsuccessfully - to get to the bottom of bug 675151:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675151

I believe this to be a Debian bug and not a bug upstream is concerned about
because upstream moved away from KMail 1 a while ago. As far as I can tell

Akonadi::ContactSearchJob *job = new Akonadi::ContactSearchJob();
job->setQuery( Akonadi::ContactSearchJob::Email, email );
job->exec();

always comes back empty regardless of whether there's such an e-mail in the
contact database or not. It affects OpenPGP but also seems to affect
distribution lists. I should mention that so far this bug has not been
confirmed by anyone.

I am not sure how I should proceed to debug this and I would be grateful for
any pointers.

In any case, thanks for all the hard work you guys put into KDE on Debian!

Cheers,
Martin

--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF
_www: http://martinralbrecht.wordpress.com/
_jab: martinralbrecht@jabber.ccc.de


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 201208101119.50419.martinralbrecht@googlemail.com" >http://lists.debian.org/201208101119.50419.martinralbrecht@googlemail.com
 
Old 08-10-2012, 11:47 AM
Diederik de Haas
 
Default bug 675151: kmail vs akonadi?

On Friday 10 August 2012 12:19:50 Martin Albrecht wrote:
> As far as I can tell
>
> Akonadi::ContactSearchJob *job = new Akonadi::ContactSearchJob();
> job->setQuery( Akonadi::ContactSearchJob::Email, email ); job->exec();
>
> always comes back empty regardless of whether there's such an e-mail in
> the contact database or not.

You may want to look over the akonadi mail archive @
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk

And then especially August and the thread that 'starts' with
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/2012-August/003003.html


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 201208101347.37439.didi.debian@cknow.org">http://lists.debian.org/201208101347.37439.didi.debian@cknow.org
 
Old 08-10-2012, 06:02 PM
Martin Albrecht
 
Default bug 675151: kmail vs akonadi?

Hi, thanks for this.

I am however not sure how exactly this thread relates except for talking about
the same object? As far as I can tell the problem I am observing is due to
Kmail being still the 1.13.x series in Debian.

Or are pointing me to:

> Enable "job tracking" in akonadiconsole

in https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/2012-August/003017.html ?

On Friday 10 Aug 2012, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Friday 10 August 2012 12:19:50 Martin Albrecht wrote:
> > As far as I can tell
> >
> > Akonadi::ContactSearchJob *job = new Akonadi::ContactSearchJob();
> > job->setQuery( Akonadi::ContactSearchJob::Email, email ); job->exec();
> >
> > always comes back empty regardless of whether there's such an e-mail in
> > the contact database or not.
>
> You may want to look over the akonadi mail archive @
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>
> And then especially August and the thread that 'starts' with
> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/2012-August/003003.html

Cheers,
Martin

--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF
_www: http://martinralbrecht.wordpress.com/
_jab: martinralbrecht@jabber.ccc.de


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 201208101902.52944.martinralbrecht@googlemail.com" >http://lists.debian.org/201208101902.52944.martinralbrecht@googlemail.com
 
Old 08-10-2012, 06:57 PM
Diederik de Haas
 
Default bug 675151: kmail vs akonadi?

On Friday 10 August 2012 20:02:52 Martin Albrecht wrote:
> I am however not sure how exactly this thread relates except for talking
> about the same object?

I follow the nepomuk ML and I remembered the code snippet that you posted was
also on that ML, so yeah, that was indeed the trigger for my response,
Other then that, the recent discussion on that ML pointed to some issues wrt to
mail and akonadi, where akonadi seemed to be the culprit.

> As far as I can tell the problem I am observing is
> due to Kmail being still the 1.13.x series in Debian.

Since your akonadi query always came back empty, which doesn't sound right,
combined with the aforementioned issues, caused me to think that akonadi was
more likely the issue then the version of KMail in Debian.

I can very well be wrong, but thought it may be worth checking out if the cause
of your issue was actually with akonadi.

Cheers,
Diederik


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 201208102057.36905.didi.debian@cknow.org">http://lists.debian.org/201208102057.36905.didi.debian@cknow.org
 
Old 08-11-2012, 12:16 PM
Martin Albrecht
 
Default bug 675151: kmail vs akonadi?

On Friday 10 Aug 2012, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > As far as I can tell the problem I am observing is
> > due to Kmail being still the 1.13.x series in Debian.
>
> Since your akonadi query always came back empty, which doesn't sound right,
> combined with the aforementioned issues, caused me to think that akonadi
> was more likely the issue then the version of KMail in Debian.
>
> I can very well be wrong, but thought it may be worth checking out if the
> cause of your issue was actually with akonadi.

I should point out that I - if memory serves - the problems started with an
update of Akonadi from 1.6.2 to 1.7.2. So I should perhaps have written that
Akonadi and KMail don't seem to agree on something (?)

On a related, can you perhaps try to reproduce the problem?

The easiest way to test as far as I know is to create a distribution list,
say, "foo". Then, when attempting to send an e-mail to the members of this
list, KMail will attempt to send an e-mail to "foo@localhost". At least this
is what is happening here in my Debian/unstable setting.

Cheers,
Martin

--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF
_www: http://martinralbrecht.wordpress.com/
_jab: martinralbrecht@jabber.ccc.de


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 201208111316.24634.martinralbrecht@googlemail.com" >http://lists.debian.org/201208111316.24634.martinralbrecht@googlemail.com
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 10:13 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org