RFS: eclipse-linuxtools 0.10.0-1 (new)
On 2012-05-19 19:00, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear java packagers,
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-linuxtools".
> * Package name : eclipse-linuxtools
> Version : 0.10.0-1
> Upstream Author : Eclipse Linux Tools project
> * URL : http://www.eclipse.org/linuxtools
> * License : EPL-1.0
> Section : devel
> It builds those binary packages:
> eclipse-cdt-autotools - Autotools support for Eclipse CDT
> eclipse-cdt-valgrind - Valgrind integration for Eclipse CDT
> eclipse-cdt-valgrind-remote - Valgrind integration for Eclipse CDT
> (remote launch)
> Package sources can be accessed at pkg-java git repository:
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
> Kind regards,
> Jakub Adam
is under GFDL-1.1 (according to the Changelog in
libhover/org.eclipse.linuxtools.cdt.libhover.glibc), but does not appear
as such in d/copyright.
GFDL is non-free unless it has no invariant sections (in that case,
please use GFDL-NIV in d/copyright).
Also, I highly doubt that the copyright of GFDL files are """Eclipse
Linux Tools project""" - knowing upstream they have a *very* strong
preference for EPL, so if they owned the files it would almost certainly
be EPL. Failing that, it would be a license with "Eclipse" painted all
over it (like their "Eclipse BSD/MIT" variant) or Apache-2.
I am more inclined to believe they copy-pasted it from other projects,
which means there should be a copyright statement from the
creators/copyright holders of these files somewhere in the sources (I
haven't found it though). If not, I am certain upstream are more than
willing to clarify the copyright of those files (given their IP rules it
should in fact be piece of cake for them).
What are *.dash files, do they come with a source and a way to
It does not seem like they declare any invariant sections, so it should
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org