FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Debian > Debian Java

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 11-07-2011, 04:39 PM
Jakub Adam
 
Default RFS: eclipse-cdt-pkg-config

Dear java packagers,

I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt-pkg-config".

* Package name : eclipse-cdt-pkg-config
Version : 0.5.3-1
Upstream Author : Petri Tuononen
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/pkg-config-support-for-eclipse-cdt/
* License : EPL-1.0
Section : devel

It builds those binary packages:

eclipse-cdt-pkg-config - pkg-config support for Eclipse C/C++ development tools

The aim of the Eclipse plug-in is to provide automation of configuration needed
for projects using pkg-config, such as GTK+ and gtkmm.

The plug-in will set options and switches automatically that gcc needs to add
in the selected packages - specifically the header file paths, the libraries,
and some other gcc switches.


Package source can be accessed at pkg-java git repository:

http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/eclipse-cdt-pkg-config.git

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards,

Jakub Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4EB817D5.6000005@ktknet.cz">http://lists.debian.org/4EB817D5.6000005@ktknet.cz
 
Old 03-11-2012, 07:24 PM
Niels Thykier
 
Default RFS: eclipse-cdt-pkg-config

On 2011-11-07 18:39, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-cdt-pkg-config".
>
> * Package name : eclipse-cdt-pkg-config
> Version : 0.5.3-1
> Upstream Author : Petri Tuononen
> * URL :
> http://code.google.com/p/pkg-config-support-for-eclipse-cdt/
> * License : EPL-1.0
> Section : devel
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> eclipse-cdt-pkg-config - pkg-config support for Eclipse C/C++
> development tools
>
> The aim of the Eclipse plug-in is to provide automation of
> configuration needed
> for projects using pkg-config, such as GTK+ and gtkmm.
>
> The plug-in will set options and switches automatically that gcc needs
> to add
> in the selected packages - specifically the header file paths, the
> libraries,
> and some other gcc switches.
>
>
> Package source can be accessed at pkg-java git repository:
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/eclipse-cdt-pkg-config.git
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jakub Adam
>
>

Hi,

I see this have (apparently) been left unanswered for a while. Is this
RFS still relevant and if so, how do did you obtain a tarball for it?
Upstream does not appear to have tarballs nor svn tags. The best I
could find was their binary releases at [1], which suggests there are
"multiple 0.5.3" versions.

If you just pulled trunk, I think it is best to go back to the
"+svn$rev" notation.

I am also not sure what to make of the copyright holder of some the
files in "templates/projecttemplates/". By the looks of it, it is a
template/example thing.
On the other hand, there seems to be a "Symbian Software" (possibly
now owned by Nokia), so it could be a real copyright statement. If the
latter is the case, the copyright statement is missing in d/copyright.

~Niels

[1]
http://code.google.com/p/pkg-config-support-for-eclipse-cdt/source/browse/#svn%2Forg.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.pkgconfig.up date%2Fplugins


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4F5D0A0B.9020104@thykier.net">http://lists.debian.org/4F5D0A0B.9020104@thykier.net
 
Old 03-11-2012, 09:36 PM
Jakub Adam
 
Default RFS: eclipse-cdt-pkg-config

Hi Niels,


I see this have (apparently) been left unanswered for a while. Is this
RFS still relevant and if so, how do did you obtain a tarball for it?
Upstream does not appear to have tarballs nor svn tags. The best I
could find was their binary releases at [1], which suggests there are
"multiple 0.5.3" versions.

If you just pulled trunk, I think it is best to go back to the
"+svn$rev" notation.


yes, this RFS is still relevant. For the source tarball I determined the
right svn revision by comparing the commit date with build timestamp of
the last upstream binary release. But if you like it better I appended
revision number to the version.


I am also not sure what to make of the copyright holder of some the
files in "templates/projecttemplates/". By the looks of it, it is a
template/example thing.
On the other hand, there seems to be a "Symbian Software" (possibly
now owned by Nokia), so it could be a real copyright statement. If the
latter is the case, the copyright statement is missing in d/copyright.


Right, template.properties and template.xml seem to have real copyrights,
added them to the list. Rest of the files are just templates with placeholders
for copyright.

Regards,

Jakub


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4F5D28D0.6040201@ktknet.cz">http://lists.debian.org/4F5D28D0.6040201@ktknet.cz
 
Old 04-03-2012, 08:50 AM
Niels Thykier
 
Default RFS: eclipse-cdt-pkg-config

On 2012-03-11 23:36, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
>> I see this have (apparently) been left unanswered for a while. Is this
>> RFS still relevant and if so, how do did you obtain a tarball for it?
>> Upstream does not appear to have tarballs nor svn tags. The best I
>> could find was their binary releases at [1], which suggests there are
>> "multiple 0.5.3" versions.
>>
>> If you just pulled trunk, I think it is best to go back to the
>> "+svn$rev" notation.
>
> yes, this RFS is still relevant. For the source tarball I determined the
> right svn revision by comparing the commit date with build timestamp of
> the last upstream binary release. But if you like it better I appended
> revision number to the version.
>
>> I am also not sure what to make of the copyright holder of some the
>> files in "templates/projecttemplates/". By the looks of it, it is a
>> template/example thing.
>> On the other hand, there seems to be a "Symbian Software" (possibly
>> now owned by Nokia), so it could be a real copyright statement. If the
>> latter is the case, the copyright statement is missing in d/copyright.
>
> Right, template.properties and template.xml seem to have real copyrights,
> added them to the list. Rest of the files are just templates with
> placeholders
> for copyright.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jakub
>
>

Hi,

Uploaded, thanks for your contribution.

... and sorry for the delay.

~Niels


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4F7AB9BF.6060007@thykier.net">http://lists.debian.org/4F7AB9BF.6060007@thykier.net
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 07:45 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org