On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 05:54:08PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:37:34PM +0100, Roger Leigh a écrit :
> When I was trying to solve my problem by myself, I looked for “/proc� as a
> keyword in the documentation and did not find a hint that not having it mounted
> was a symptom of not using the type I intended. If you think that others may
> make a similar error, how about the following patch to the schroot
> documentation?
>
> diff --git a/man/schroot.conf.5.in b/man/schroot.conf.5.in
> index 40cec0d..92e08b9 100644
> --- a/man/schroot.conf.5.in
> +++ b/man/schroot.conf.5.in
> @@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ Plain and directory chroots
> .PP
> Chroots of type [oq]plain[cq] or [oq]directory[cq] are directories
> accessible in the filesystem. The two types are equivalent except for the fact
> -that directory chroots run setup scripts, whereas plain chroots do not.
> +that directory chroots run setup scripts, whereas plain chroots do not. As a
> +consequence, virtual filesystems like f[BI]/procfP are not mounted in plain chroots.
> Additionally, directory chroots implement the fBfilesystem union chrootfP
> options (see [lq]fIFilesystem Union chroot optionsfP[rq], below).
> .PP

I will add something along these lines to the documentation. Thanks
for the suggestion!


Regards,
Roger

--
.'`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.