Hi,

I have updated freemind in our svn repo to work with libjibx1.2-java
instead of libjibx1.1-java. I suggest to upload freemind
0.9.0~rc6+dfsg-4 with that change and to file removal requests against
libjibx-java (1.0) and libjibx1.1-java. Are there any reasons to keep
the old versions of jibx that I am not aware of?

Cheers,
Torsten


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: s2pa90bfcf1005080840qd28f71axd53ff5c8cad34156@mail .gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/s2pa90bfcf1005080840qd28f71axd53ff5c8cad34156@mail .gmail.com

Hello,

ergh, sorry but I rolled-back this change as I packaged the next version
of FreeMind (0.9.0~rc7, uploaded 2 seconds ago on mentors).


Reason: I want the FreeMind package to keep working under Debian and
Ubuntu without having to keep 2 sets of patches (or even having to
rebuild the package).


Once JiBx1.2 is available in Ubuntu, I'll abandon my blockade.

Hope this is OK, and sorry for the trouble, I wanted to inform you right
now, but well, then I discovered your email...

Eric

On 08/05/10 17:40, Torsten Werner wrote:

Hi,

I have updated freemind in our svn repo to work with libjibx1.2-java
instead of libjibx1.1-java. I suggest to upload freemind
0.9.0~rc6+dfsg-4 with that change and to file removal requests against
libjibx-java (1.0) and libjibx1.1-java. Are there any reasons to keep
the old versions of jibx that I am not aware of?

Cheers,
Torsten





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4BE5C58C.7020706@zorglub.s.bawue.de">http://lists.debian.org/4BE5C58C.7020706@zorglub.s.bawue.de

Hi Eric,

On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Eric Lavarde <deb@zorglub.s.bawue.de> wrote:
> Once JiBx1.2 is available in Ubuntu, I'll abandon my blockade.

but may we remove version 1.0 from the archive at least?

Torsten


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: i2wa90bfcf1005081803o1bb686e4v2d66eef42ea175ad@mai l.gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/i2wa90bfcf1005081803o1bb686e4v2d66eef42ea175ad@mai l.gmail.com

On 09/05/10 03:03, Torsten Werner wrote:

Hi Eric,

On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Eric Lavarde<deb@zorglub.s.bawue.de> wrote:

Once JiBx1.2 is available in Ubuntu, I'll abandon my blockade.


but may we remove version 1.0 from the archive at least?

Yes, please, do.

Thanks, Eric


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4BE6476F.9070203@zorglub.s.bawue.de">http://lists.debian.org/4BE6476F.9070203@zorglub.s.bawue.de

Hi Torsten,

On 05/08/2010 05:40 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:

> I have updated freemind in our svn repo to work with libjibx1.2-java
> instead of libjibx1.1-java. I suggest to upload freemind
> 0.9.0~rc6+dfsg-4 with that change and to file removal requests against
> libjibx-java (1.0) and libjibx1.1-java. Are there any reasons to keep
> the old versions of jibx that I am not aware of?

we have Eucalyptus in the new queue build-depending on the 1.1 version.
Sorry for not replying any earlier, I was traveling and mostly offline.

If there is a way to possibly postpone the RM a bit, then this would
be appreciated. I'd very much like to see Eucalyptus arrive at some time
and give it some peace before changing it on too many fronts.

I have CCed Chris from upstream. To my understanding, the parallel upload
of 1.2 is painlessly possible, because of the versioned packaging, right?

Best,

Steffen


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4BEC36FC.4020304@gmx.de">http://lists.debian.org/4BEC36FC.4020304@gmx.de