FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Debian > Debian Java

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 03-21-2010, 11:25 AM
Onkar Shinde
 
Default RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

While working on logkit -> excalibur-logkit migration I stumbled upon
jython package which has few problems as per latest conventions for
java packaging. I have fixed these problems along with some lintian
errors/warnings and uploaded the package to mentors.debian.net. The
package maintainer is listed on lowthresholdnmu page. So this package
can be uploaded immediately.

Please sponsor the package -
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jython/jython_2.2.1-2.1.dsc

Latest changelog for reference
jython (2.2.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=low

* Non-maintainer upload.
* Update build/runtime dependencies to appropriate default-j* packages.
(Closes: #463114, #570195)
* lintian error/warning fixes.
- debian/control
- Move ant to build-depends.
- Add miscepends to dependencies.
- Update standards version to 3.8.4.
- debian/*.doc-base.*
- Remove 'Apps' from 'Section' value.
- Remove single white space at the end of file.
- debian/copyright
- Convert to UTF-8 encoding.

-- Onkar Shinde <onkarshinde@ubuntu.com> Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:25:59 +0530


Onkar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: c9c316091003210525s3f096946n719f33cc6d2e3526@mail. gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/c9c316091003210525s3f096946n719f33cc6d2e3526@mail. gmail.com
 
Old 03-21-2010, 03:25 PM
Matthew Johnson
 
Default RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

On Sun Mar 21 17:55, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> While working on logkit -> excalibur-logkit migration I stumbled upon
> jython package which has few problems as per latest conventions for
> java packaging. I have fixed these problems along with some lintian
> errors/warnings and uploaded the package to mentors.debian.net. The
> package maintainer is listed on lowthresholdnmu page. So this package
> can be uploaded immediately.

The maintainer is on lowthresholdnmu, but that does not absolve you from the
rest of the NMU procedure[0], namely, filing the patches in the BTS against the
relative bugs, contacting the maintainer directly with your intention to NMU
and not making changes that don't fix actual bugs.

Having said that, the upload looks good, but can you please do the appropriate
paperwork first.

Matt

0. http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu

--
Matthew Johnson
 
Old 03-21-2010, 03:25 PM
tony mancill
 
Default RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

Uploaded to the archive.

Thank you,
Tony

Onkar Shinde wrote:
> While working on logkit -> excalibur-logkit migration I stumbled upon
> jython package which has few problems as per latest conventions for
> java packaging. I have fixed these problems along with some lintian
> errors/warnings and uploaded the package to mentors.debian.net. The
> package maintainer is listed on lowthresholdnmu page. So this package
> can be uploaded immediately.
>
> Please sponsor the package -
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jython/jython_2.2.1-2.1.dsc
>
> Latest changelog for reference
> jython (2.2.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> * Update build/runtime dependencies to appropriate default-j* packages.
> (Closes: #463114, #570195)
> * lintian error/warning fixes.
> - debian/control
> - Move ant to build-depends.
> - Add miscepends to dependencies.
> - Update standards version to 3.8.4.
> - debian/*.doc-base.*
> - Remove 'Apps' from 'Section' value.
> - Remove single white space at the end of file.
> - debian/copyright
> - Convert to UTF-8 encoding.
>
> -- Onkar Shinde <onkarshinde@ubuntu.com> Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:25:59 +0530
>
>
> Onkar
>
>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4BA64896.1000503@mancill.com">http://lists.debian.org/4BA64896.1000503@mancill.com
 
Old 03-21-2010, 03:39 PM
tony mancill
 
Default RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yes, and it's definitely my mistake for sponsoring without checking the bug. I
cc:ed Nicolas on the upload and here again. Nicolas, my apologies for the
over-zealous upload.

Thank you,
Tony

Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Sun Mar 21 17:55, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> While working on logkit -> excalibur-logkit migration I stumbled upon
>> jython package which has few problems as per latest conventions for
>> java packaging. I have fixed these problems along with some lintian
>> errors/warnings and uploaded the package to mentors.debian.net. The
>> package maintainer is listed on lowthresholdnmu page. So this package
>> can be uploaded immediately.
>
> The maintainer is on lowthresholdnmu, but that does not absolve you from the
> rest of the NMU procedure[0], namely, filing the patches in the BTS against the
> relative bugs, contacting the maintainer directly with your intention to NMU
> and not making changes that don't fix actual bugs.
>
> Having said that, the upload looks good, but can you please do the appropriate
> paperwork first.
>
> Matt
>
> 0. http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkumS8sACgkQpdwBkPlyvgNDowCeMy3gYoQN3E TJwW/mQIyRs8gQ
8KoAn2A8wZDMoRKamLdLv8sYz9kegNne
=5b4M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4BA64BD7.7030600@debian.org">http://lists.debian.org/4BA64BD7.7030600@debian.org
 
Old 03-21-2010, 04:54 PM
Onkar Shinde
 
Default RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Matthew Johnson <mjj29@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun Mar 21 17:55, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> While working on logkit -> excalibur-logkit migration I stumbled upon
>> jython package which has few problems as per latest conventions for
>> java packaging. I have fixed these problems along with some lintian
>> errors/warnings and uploaded the package to mentors.debian.net. The
>> package maintainer is listed on lowthresholdnmu page. So this package
>> can be uploaded immediately.
>
> The maintainer is on lowthresholdnmu, but that does not absolve you from the
> rest of the NMU procedure[0], namely, filing the patches in the BTS against the
> relative bugs, contacting the maintainer directly with your intention to NMU
> and not making changes that don't fix actual bugs.
>
> Having said that, the upload looks good, but can you please do the appropriate
> paperwork first.

Considering that the maintainer did not reply to bugs in question for
long time, I assumed it was ok to seek sponsors directly. My mistake.
I will be carefully follow the procedure next time.

By the way the changes I did fixed only fixed mostly lintian
errors/warnings. Should that be avoided when doing NMU?


Onkar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: c9c316091003211054x55692ef9r735584705c3fd565@mail. gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/c9c316091003211054x55692ef9r735584705c3fd565@mail. gmail.com
 
Old 03-21-2010, 04:59 PM
Matthew Johnson
 
Default RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

On Sun Mar 21 23:24, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> By the way the changes I did fixed only fixed mostly lintian
> errors/warnings. Should that be avoided when doing NMU?

You should not be fixing lintian warnings for the sake of it, NMU procedure
says "only fix filed bugs". In the case of moving ant to build-depends, for
example, that is a genuine bug, so even though there's no bug number it's ok

Matt

--
Matthew Johnson
 
Old 03-21-2010, 05:07 PM
Onkar Shinde
 
Default RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Matthew Johnson <mjj29@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun Mar 21 23:24, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> By the way the changes I did fixed only fixed mostly lintian
>> errors/warnings. Should that be avoided when doing NMU?
>
> You should not be fixing lintian warnings *for the sake of it, NMU procedure
> says "only fix filed bugs". In the case of moving ant to build-depends, for
> example, that is a genuine bug, so even though there's no bug number it's ok

Ok. I will keep this in mind.

Onkar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: c9c316091003211107q759f309fi752d0f623e4c1c46@mail. gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/c9c316091003211107q759f309fi752d0f623e4c1c46@mail. gmail.com
 
Old 03-22-2010, 07:44 PM
Nicolas Duboc
 
Default RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 09:39:51AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Yes, and it's definitely my mistake for sponsoring without checking the bug. I
> cc:ed Nicolas on the upload and here again. Nicolas, my apologies for the
> over-zealous upload.

No problem. I have to admit I wasn't very active these last weeks.
Thanks for your NMU.

I actually hoped to upload jython 2.5 rapidly and didn't bother to
work on 2.1. So your upload is appreciated as it fixes the current
issues until I upload version 2.5.


--
Nicolas Duboc <nduboc@debian.org>
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:40 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org