FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Debian > Debian Java

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 02-23-2010, 11:44 AM
Mathieu Malaterre
 
Default Please review xslthl (docbook related)

Hi there,

I am looking for a sponsor for the xslthl package:

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xslthl/xslthl_2.0.1-1.dsc

http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=xslthl

It appears to be lintian clean.

Thanks
--
Mathieu


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: bf0c3b3f1002230444y43a465abieaa77bbc063e6367@mail. gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/bf0c3b3f1002230444y43a465abieaa77bbc063e6367@mail. gmail.com
 
Old 02-23-2010, 11:56 AM
Sylvestre Ledru
 
Default Please review xslthl (docbook related)

Le mardi 23 février 2010 à 13:44 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
> Hi there,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the xslthl package:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xslthl/xslthl_2.0.1-1.dsc
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=xslthl
>
> It appears to be lintian clean.
Could you import it on the pkg-java svn ?

Otherwise, a priori, I don't see any problem.

Sylvestre



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 1266929807.13169.23886.camel@korcula.inria.fr">htt p://lists.debian.org/1266929807.13169.23886.camel@korcula.inria.fr
 
Old 02-23-2010, 12:10 PM
Mathieu Malaterre
 
Default Please review xslthl (docbook related)

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org> wrote:
> Le mardi 23 février 2010 à 13:44 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>> Hi there,
>>
>> * I am looking for a sponsor for the xslthl package:
>>
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xslthl/xslthl_2.0.1-1.dsc
>>
>> http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=xslthl
>>
>> It appears to be lintian clean.
> Could you import it on the pkg-java svn ?
>
> Otherwise, a priori, I don't see any problem.

$ svn ci -m"import xslthl on pkg-java" xslthl/
Adding xslthl
Adding xslthl/debian
Adding xslthl/debian/changelog
Adding xslthl/debian/compat
Adding xslthl/debian/control
Adding xslthl/debian/copyright
Adding xslthl/debian/get-orig-source
Adding xslthl/debian/libxslthl-java.install
Adding xslthl/debian/libxslthl-java.jlibs
Adding xslthl/debian/rules
Adding xslthl/debian/watch
Transmitting file data .........
Committed revision 11687.

I updated the Vcs-Svn: / Vcs-Browser: info.

Cheers,
--
Mathieu


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: bf0c3b3f1002230510x329bc339od727fb6102d2555d@mail. gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/bf0c3b3f1002230510x329bc339od727fb6102d2555d@mail. gmail.com
 
Old 02-23-2010, 12:42 PM
Matthew Johnson
 
Default Please review xslthl (docbook related)

On Tue Feb 23 13:56, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xslthl/xslthl_2.0.1-1.dsc
> >
> > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=xslthl
> >
> > It appears to be lintian clean.
> Could you import it on the pkg-java svn ?
>
> Otherwise, a priori, I don't see any problem.

I do, it almost certainly should be default-jdk, not default-jdk-builddep.

Also (not crucial, but) - you're licencing the package as GPL-2+ but the
software is BSD-alike, which makes the resulting package GPL-2+. We generally
recommend using the same licence for the packaging as for the software.

I'd also recommend the dh 7 style of debian/rules, but that's just personal
preference.

Licence review shows the following: several files are missing licence headers
(not a problem per-se, but upstream might like to know). What is a problem is
that ./examples/sources/example-javascript.xml says:

* @projectDescription Javascript snippet to generate the lyrics of the song "99 Bottles".^M
* Copyright (c) 2008 Ariel Flesler - aflesler(at)gmail(dot)com | http://flesler.blogspot.com^M
* Date: 3/27/2008^M
* @author Ariel Flesler^M
* --This script follows the standard specified by scriptDoc: http://scriptdoc.org/^M

with no licence grant, so needs to be clarified or stripped out. This is true
of a number of other examples there, some of which have no licence header and
some have a copyright statement and no licence grant. Since they all appear to
bet third-party, this makes it harder to ignore the lack of header than the
files in the main source tree.

./examples/sources/example-xml.xml is licenced under the GPL, but not mentioned
in debian/copyright, nor are any of the other examples. Personally, I'd
recommend stripping all the examples from the source tarball.

Matt

--
Matthew Johnson
 
Old 02-23-2010, 01:01 PM
Mathieu Malaterre
 
Default Please review xslthl (docbook related)

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Matthew Johnson <mjj29@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue Feb 23 13:56, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xslthl/xslthl_2.0.1-1.dsc
>> >
>> > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=xslthl
>> >
>> > It appears to be lintian clean.
>> Could you import it on the pkg-java svn ?
>>
>> Otherwise, a priori, I don't see any problem.
>
> I do, it almost certainly should be default-jdk, not default-jdk-builddep.
>
> Also (not crucial, but) - you're licencing the package as GPL-2+ but the
> software is BSD-alike, which makes the resulting package GPL-2+. We generally
> recommend using the same licence for the packaging as for the software.
>
> I'd also recommend the dh 7 style of debian/rules, but that's just personal
> preference.
>
> Licence review shows the following: several files are missing licence headers
> (not a problem per-se, but upstream might like to know). What is a problem is
> that ./examples/sources/example-javascript.xml says:
>
> ** @projectDescription Javascript snippet to generate the lyrics of the song "99 Bottles".^M
> ** Copyright (c) 2008 Ariel Flesler - aflesler(at)gmail(dot)com | http://flesler.blogspot.com^M
> ** Date: 3/27/2008^M
> ** @author Ariel Flesler^M
> ** --This script follows the standard specified by scriptDoc: http://scriptdoc.org/^M
>
> with no licence grant, so needs to be clarified or stripped out. This is true
> of a number of other examples there, some of which have no licence header and
> some have a copyright statement and no licence grant. Since they all appear to
> bet third-party, this makes it harder to ignore the lack of header than the
> files in the main source tree.
>
> ./examples/sources/example-xml.xml is licenced under the GPL, but not mentioned
> in debian/copyright, nor are any of the other examples. Personally, I'd
> recommend stripping all the examples from the source tarball.

Done, as suggested.

$ svn ci -m"Integrate suggestion from Matt Johnson"


~/debian/pkg-java/trunk/xslthl
Adding xslthl/debian/README.source
Sending xslthl/debian/changelog
Sending xslthl/debian/control
Sending xslthl/debian/copyright
Sending xslthl/debian/get-orig-source
Adding xslthl/debian/libxslthl-java.docs
Sending xslthl/debian/rules
Transmitting file data .......
Committed revision 11689.


I did document the README.source since user may not be able to read
the get-orig-source file.

Thanks,
--
Mathieu


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: bf0c3b3f1002230601r591c6c7du2bea8976fbbe2bcc@mail. gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/bf0c3b3f1002230601r591c6c7du2bea8976fbbe2bcc@mail. gmail.com
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:51 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org