Questions about batik 1.7 update
For some time I have been trying to package batik 1.7 for Ubuntu
Intrepid. In the process I have packaged it's dependency
I have done repackaging of upstream source in similar manner to how it
was done for 1.6, with svn export from fop. But some doubts were
discussed in #ubuntu-motu on which we would like to have your inputs.
1. Should the code downloaded by svn export go as patch instead of
inside repackaged source?
2. If the answer to above is 'it should go in repackaged source', then
what should be the version? Should it contain .dfsg or +svn?
 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/batik/+bug/150484
 - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/xml-commons-external
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com
|All times are GMT. The time now is 11:09 PM.|
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.