FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Debian > Debian GCC

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 01-13-2010, 06:38 AM
DDPOMail robot
 
Default Possible problems in your Debian packages

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

=== gcc-4.4:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #564685 <http://bugs.debian.org/564685>
regressions in binutils testsuite on armel, when built with gcc-4.4
= Lintian reports 11 error(s) and 110 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gcc-4.4

=== gcc-defaults:
= No migration to testing for 37 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gcc-defaults>
= Lintian reports 18 error(s) and 52 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gcc-defaults

=== gcj-4.3:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #553159 <http://bugs.debian.org/553159>
gappletviewer-4.3: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/bin/gappletviewer-4.3 but the package doesn't depend on the C library package. Normally this indicates that ${shlibs: Depends} was omitted from the Depends line for this package in debian/control.
= Lintian reports 10 error(s) and 15 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gcj-4.3

=== gcj-4.4:
= No migration to testing for 18 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gcj-4.4>
= Lintian reports 1 error(s) and 22 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gcj-4.4

=== gdc-4.1:
= Lintian reports 2 error(s) and 4 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gdc-4.1

=== gnat-4.3:
= 3 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #556844 <http://bugs.debian.org/556844>
gnat-4.3: FTBFS:ali.adb:1825:41: (style) bad casing of "NUL" declared in Standard
- #553236 <http://bugs.debian.org/553236>
libgnatvsn4.3: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/lib/libgnatvsn.so.4.3 but the package doesn't depend on the C library package. Normally this indicates that ${shlibs: Depends} was omitted from the Depends line for this package in debian/control.
- #553237 <http://bugs.debian.org/553237>
libgnatprj4.3: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/lib/libgnatprj.so.4.3 but the package doesn't depend on the C library package. Normally this indicates that ${shlibs: Depends} was omitted from the Depends line for this package in debian/control.
= Lintian reports 4 error(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gnat-4.3

=== ppl:
= Missing build(s) on kfreebsd-i386,kfreebsd-amd64
This might need manual action from your side.
See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ppl
= Lintian reports 8 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#ppl

=== Packages with a new upstream version according to DEHS:
gdc-4.1 4.1.2 (Debian: 0.25-20080616-4.1.2-27)
libffi 3.0.9rc12 (Debian: 3.0.9-1)

------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------
We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe <email>
You will no longer receive any mail for any package. If you received
this email because you are subscribed to packages on the PTS, this
won't remove your PTS subscription.
- ignore <package> <email>
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore <bug> <email>
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions or if you
believe it can be improved. The wiki page will be updated with useful
information.
--
DDPOMail,
run by Raphael Geissert


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
 
Old 01-13-2010, 06:38 AM
DDPOMail robot
 
Default Possible problems in your Debian packages

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

=== firmware-nonfree:
= No migration to testing for 80 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=firmware-nonfree>
= Lintian reports 1 error(s) and 32 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-kernel@lists.debian.org.html#firmware-nonfree

=== linux-2.6:
= There are 26 unfixed security issue(s), please fix them.
See http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/linux-2.6
= 4 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #535331 <http://bugs.debian.org/535331>
lilo not run after install/upgrade
Appears to affect stable, you should fix it for the next point release
- #559037 <http://bugs.debian.org/559037>
radeon DRI driver corrupts memory
- #564110 <http://bugs.debian.org/564110>
r8169: Fix for CVE-2009-1389 introduces denial of service issue
Appears to affect stable, you should fix it for the next point release
- #551937 <http://bugs.debian.org/551937>
iproute: "ip -6 route replace ..." behaves as "ip -6 route add ..."
Part of release goal: IPv6 support
= No migration to testing for 80 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=linux-2.6>
= Lintian reports 1 error(s) and 236 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-kernel@lists.debian.org.html#linux-2.6

=== linux-kbuild-2.6:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #530125 <http://bugs.debian.org/530125>
linux-kbuild-2.6.29: bashism in /bin/sh script
Part of release goal: switch /bin/sh to dash
= No migration to testing for 80 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=linux-kbuild-2.6>

=== linux-latest-2.6:
= No migration to testing for 80 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=linux-latest-2.6>
= Lintian reports 2 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-kernel@lists.debian.org.html#linux-latest-2.6

------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------
We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe <email>
You will no longer receive any mail for any package. If you received
this email because you are subscribed to packages on the PTS, this
won't remove your PTS subscription.
- ignore <package> <email>
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore <bug> <email>
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-kernel@lists.debian.org

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions or if you
believe it can be improved. The wiki page will be updated with useful
information.
--
DDPOMail,
run by Raphael Geissert


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
 
Old 01-13-2010, 06:43 AM
DDPOMail robot
 
Default Possible problems in your Debian packages

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

=== madfuload:
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #547336 <http://bugs.debian.org/547336>
Various fixes to madfuload from Ubuntu
Appears to affect stable, you should fix it for the next point release
= Lintian reports 3 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com.html#madfuload

------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------
We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe <email>
You will no longer receive any mail for any package. If you received
this email because you are subscribed to packages on the PTS, this
won't remove your PTS subscription.
- ignore <package> <email>
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore <bug> <email>
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions or if you
believe it can be improved. The wiki page will be updated with useful
information.
--
DDPOMail,
run by Raphael Geissert

--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
 
Old 02-13-2010, 05:08 PM
DDPOMail robot
 
Default Possible problems in your Debian packages

=== gcc-4.4:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #558999 <http://bugs.debian.org/558999>
FTBFS [hppa] - recompile with -ffunction-sections
= Missing build(s) on armel
This might need manual action from your side.
See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-4.4
= Lintian: 11 error(s) and 33 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gcc-4.4

=== gcj-4.3:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #553159 <http://bugs.debian.org/553159>
gappletviewer-4.3: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/bin/gappletviewer-4.3 but the package doesn't depend on the C library package. Normally this indicates that ${shlibs: Depends} was omitted from the Depends line for this package in debian/control.
= Lintian: 10 error(s) and 15 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gcj-4.3

=== gdc-4.1:
= Lintian: 2 error(s) and 4 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gdc-4.1

=== gnat-4.3:
= 3 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #556844 <http://bugs.debian.org/556844>
gnat-4.3: FTBFS:ali.adb:1825:41: (style) bad casing of "NUL" declared in Standard
- #553236 <http://bugs.debian.org/553236>
libgnatvsn4.3: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/lib/libgnatvsn.so.4.3 but the package doesn't depend on the C library package. Normally this indicates that ${shlibs: Depends} was omitted from the Depends line for this package in debian/control.
- #553237 <http://bugs.debian.org/553237>
libgnatprj4.3: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/lib/libgnatprj.so.4.3 but the package doesn't depend on the C library package. Normally this indicates that ${shlibs: Depends} was omitted from the Depends line for this package in debian/control.
= Lintian: 4 error(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gnat-4.3

=== gpc-4.1:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #569375 <http://bugs.debian.org/569375>
gpc-4.1: FTBFS: Will run the testsuite with -m32: ld returned 1 exit status

=== java-gcj-compat:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #566514 <http://bugs.debian.org/566514>
gcc-defaults makes java-gcj-compat-headless uninstallable
= Not in testing for 26 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=java-gcj-compat>
= Lintian: 1 error(s) and 8 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#java-gcj-compat

=== ppl:
= Missing build(s) on powerpc
This might need manual action from your side.
See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ppl
= No migration to testing for 122 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ppl>

=== Packages with a new upstream version according to DEHS:
gdc-4.1 4.1.2 (Debian: 0.25-20080616-4.1.2-27)
libffi 3.0.9rc12 (Debian: 3.0.9-1)

------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe <email>
You will no longer receive any mail for any package. If you received
this email because you are subscribed to packages on the PTS, this
won't remove your PTS subscription.
- ignore <package> <email>
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore <bug> <email>
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions or if you
believe it can be improved. The wiki page will be updated with useful
information.
--
DDPOMail,
run by Lucas Nussbaum


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
 
Old 02-13-2010, 05:08 PM
DDPOMail robot
 
Default Possible problems in your Debian packages

=== linux-2.6:
= 7 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #559037 <http://bugs.debian.org/559037>
radeon DRI driver corrupts memory
- #511963 <http://bugs.debian.org/511963>
linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64: bridge + ipv6 = WARNING:
Part of release goal: IPv6 support
- #564110 <http://bugs.debian.org/564110>
r8169: Fix for CVE-2009-1389 introduces denial of service issue
- #524003 <http://bugs.debian.org/524003>
tokyocabinet FTBFS on armel and hppa
- #509156 <http://bugs.debian.org/509156>
kernel debian/rules misses patch instructions and target
Part of release goal: IPv6 support
- #551937 <http://bugs.debian.org/551937>
iproute: "ip -6 route replace ..." behaves as "ip -6 route add ..."
Part of release goal: IPv6 support
- #508460 <http://bugs.debian.org/508460>
ipv6: add/up results in permanent 'tentative' flag, up/add works
Part of release goal: IPv6 support
= Missing build(s) on s390
This might need manual action from your side.
See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=linux-2.6
= No migration to testing for 111 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=linux-2.6>
= Lintian: 1 error(s) and 247 warning(s)
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-kernel@lists.debian.org.html#linux-2.6

=== linux-kbuild-2.6:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #530125 <http://bugs.debian.org/530125>
linux-kbuild-2.6.29: bashism in /bin/sh script
Part of release goal: switch /bin/sh to dash

------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe <email>
You will no longer receive any mail for any package. If you received
this email because you are subscribed to packages on the PTS, this
won't remove your PTS subscription.
- ignore <package> <email>
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore <bug> <email>
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-kernel@lists.debian.org

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions or if you
believe it can be improved. The wiki page will be updated with useful
information.
--
DDPOMail,
run by Lucas Nussbaum


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
 
Old 02-13-2010, 05:11 PM
DDPOMail robot
 
Default Possible problems in your Debian packages

=== madfuload:
= 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s):
- #547336 <http://bugs.debian.org/547336>
Various fixes to madfuload from Ubuntu
= Not in testing for 26 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=madfuload>

------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe <email>
You will no longer receive any mail for any package. If you received
this email because you are subscribed to packages on the PTS, this
won't remove your PTS subscription.
- ignore <package> <email>
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore <bug> <email>
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions or if you
believe it can be improved. The wiki page will be updated with useful
information.
--
DDPOMail,
run by Lucas Nussbaum

--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
 
Old 02-14-2010, 05:50 PM
Andreas Tille
 
Default Possible problems in your Debian packages

----- Forwarded message from DDPOMail robot <lucas@debian.org> -----

From: DDPOMail robot <lucas@debian.org>
To: Debian-Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:08:13 +0000
Subject: Possible problems in your Debian packages

=== phylip:
= No migration to testing for 155 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=phylip>

I wonder why this package has problems because the link does not uncover
any reason why it is not (yet) builded on several architectures. One
reason might be that it is a non-free package - but it is not clear to
to me what I should do now.

Kind regards

Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20100214185002.GB21586@an3as.eu">http://lists.debian.org/20100214185002.GB21586@an3as.eu
 
Old 02-14-2010, 06:12 PM
Ben Hutchings
 
Default Possible problems in your Debian packages

On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 19:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> ----- Forwarded message from DDPOMail robot <lucas@debian.org> -----
>
> From: DDPOMail robot <lucas@debian.org>
> To: Debian-Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org>
> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:08:13 +0000
> Subject: Possible problems in your Debian packages
>
> === phylip:
> = No migration to testing for 155 days.
> See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=phylip>
>
> I wonder why this package has problems because the link does not uncover
> any reason why it is not (yet) builded on several architectures. One
> reason might be that it is a non-free package - but it is not clear to
> to me what I should do now.

There is not currently a full set of auto-builders for non-free. So far
as I know, your only options at the moment are to request removal of the
outdated binaries or build and upload for those architectures yourself.

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings
It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.
 
Old 03-23-2010, 10:13 PM
DDPOMail robot
 
Default Possible problems in your Debian packages

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

=== gcc-4.3:
= Missing build(s) on kfreebsd-amd64
This might need manual action from your side.
See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-4.3
= No migration to testing for 35 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gcc-4.3>

=== gcc-4.4:
= 1 Release Critical bug(s):
- #558999 <http://bugs.debian.org/558999>
FTBFS [hppa] - recompile with -ffunction-sections
= Missing build(s) on armel ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel
This might need manual action from your side.
See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-4.4
= No migration to testing for 73 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gcc-4.4>

=== gcc-doc-defaults:
= 1 Release Critical bug(s):
- #573954 <http://bugs.debian.org/573954>
gcc docs still default to gcc-4.3

=== gcj-4.3:
= 1 Release Critical bug(s):
- #553159 <http://bugs.debian.org/553159>
gappletviewer-4.3: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/bin/gappletviewer-4.3 but the package doesn't depend on the C library package. Normally this indicates that ${shlibs: Depends} was omitted from the Depends line for this package in debian/control.

=== gcj-4.4:
= 1 Release Critical bug(s):
- #561414 <http://bugs.debian.org/561414>
FTBFS [hppa]: GC Warning
= Missing build(s) on mipsel
This might need manual action from your side.
See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcj-4.4

=== gpc-4.1:
= 1 Release Critical bug(s):
- #569375 <http://bugs.debian.org/569375>
gpc-4.1: FTBFS: Will run the testsuite with -m32: ld returned 1 exit status

=== java-gcj-compat:
= 1 Release Critical bug(s):
- #566514 <http://bugs.debian.org/566514>
gcc-defaults makes java-gcj-compat-headless uninstallable
= Not in testing for 64 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=java-gcj-compat>

=== Packages with a new upstream version according to DEHS:
gdc-4.1 4.1.2 (Debian: 0.25-20080616-4.1.2-27)
gdc-4.3 4.3.4 (Debian: 1.043-4.3.4-1)
libffi 3.0.9rc12 (Debian: 3.0.9-1)

=== Packages with lintian errors and warnings:
- gcc-4.3 (0 errors, 37 warnings)
<http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gcc-4.3>
- gcc-4.4 (11 errors, 36 warnings)
<http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gcc-4.4>
- gcc-doc-defaults (0 errors, 16 warnings)
<http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gcc-doc-defaults>
- gcj-4.3 (10 errors, 25 warnings)
<http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gcj-4.3>
- gcj-4.4 (1 errors, 12 warnings)
<http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gcj-4.4>
- gdc-4.1 (2 errors, 6 warnings)
<http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gdc-4.1>
- gdc-4.3 (0 errors, 5 warnings)
<http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gdc-4.3>
- gpc-4.1 (0 errors, 4 warnings)
<http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#gpc-4.1>
- java-gcj-compat (1 errors, 8 warnings)
<http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-gcc@lists.debian.org.html#java-gcj-compat>

------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------
We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe <email>
You will no longer receive any mail for any package. If you received
this email because you are subscribed to packages on the PTS, this
won't remove your PTS subscription.
- ignore <package> <email>
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore <bug> <email>
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions or if you
believe it can be improved. The wiki page will be updated with useful
information.
--
DDPOMail,
run by Lucas Nussbaum


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: E1NuDIN-00031r-9D@samosa.debian.org">http://lists.debian.org/E1NuDIN-00031r-9D@samosa.debian.org
 
Old 03-23-2010, 10:14 PM
DDPOMail robot
 
Default Possible problems in your Debian packages

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

=== linux-2.6:
= 7 Release Critical bug(s):
- #559578 <http://bugs.debian.org/559578>
eeepc-acpi-scripts: EeePC 701 freezes with garbled screen while booting
- #564110 <http://bugs.debian.org/564110>
r8169: Fix for CVE-2009-1389 introduces denial of service issue
- #568421 <http://bugs.debian.org/568421>
Xorg locked in vga_get
- #569797 <http://bugs.debian.org/569797>
misaligned signal stack on sparc
- #572442 <http://bugs.debian.org/572442>
sparc 2.6.29+ NMI watchdog deadlock on Sun Fire V240 etc
- #574630 <http://bugs.debian.org/574630>
linux-base: postinst fails if udev's persistent-cd.rules has duplicates
- #574795 <http://bugs.debian.org/574795>
Libata transition and HPA caused disk size truncation
= Missing build(s) on alpha hppa sparc
This might need manual action from your side.
See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=linux-2.6

=== Packages with lintian errors and warnings:
- linux-2.6 (3 errors, 258 warnings)
<http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/debian-kernel@lists.debian.org.html#linux-2.6>

------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------
We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.

If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe <email>
You will no longer receive any mail for any package. If you received
this email because you are subscribed to packages on the PTS, this
won't remove your PTS subscription.
- ignore <package> <email>
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore <bug> <email>
You will no longer receive information about this bug.

All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.

A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-kernel@lists.debian.org

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions or if you
believe it can be improved. The wiki page will be updated with useful
information.
--
DDPOMail,
run by Lucas Nussbaum


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: E1NuDIO-00032F-2Y@samosa.debian.org">http://lists.debian.org/E1NuDIO-00032F-2Y@samosa.debian.org
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:51 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org