Please have a look at the gcc-4.7 package in experimental, update patches (hurd,
kfreebsd, ARM is fixed in svn), and investigate the build failures (currently
ia64, but more will appear).
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4EEE7D60.9000202@debian.org">http://lists.debian.org/4EEE7D60.9000202@debian.org
Matthias Klose, le Mon 19 Dec 2011 00:55:12 +0100, a écrit :
> Please have a look at the gcc-4.7 package in experimental, update patches (hurd,
> kfreebsd, ARM is fixed in svn), and investigate the build failures (currently
> ia64, but more will appear).
I am doing it for hurd already, patch pending submission.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20111219002121.GD4116@type.famille.thibault.fr">ht tp://lists.debian.org/20111219002121.GD4116@type.famille.thibault.fr
On 19 December 2011 01:55, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:
> Please have a look at the gcc-4.7 package in experimental, update patches (hurd,
> kfreebsd, ARM is fixed in svn), and investigate the build failures (currently
> ia64, but more will appear).
Attached is the build failure on armhf (clean chroot with all bdeps satisfied).
El 19 de desembre de 2011 0:55, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> ha escrit:
> Please have a look at the gcc-4.7 package in experimental, update patches (hurd,
> kfreebsd, ARM is fixed in svn), and investigate the build failures (currently
> ia64, but more will appear).
Existing kbsd-gnu.diff is obsolete, please replace with attached build fix.
Please have a look at the gcc-4.7 package in experimental, update patches (hurd,
kfreebsd, ARM is fixed in svn), and investigate the build failures (currently
ia64, but more will appear).
Armel and armhf cross compilers builds fine under Ubuntu. Biarch
compilation failed but I did not checked why.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4EEFB289.5070705@canonical.com">http://lists.debian.org/4EEFB289.5070705@canonical.com
On ppc64, both packages of gcc-4.7 (4.7-20111217-2) and gcj-4.7 (4.7-20111217-1) were built without any problem.
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please have a look at the gcc-4.7 package in experimental, update patches (hurd,
> kfreebsd, ARM is fixed in svn), and investigate the build failures (currently
> ia64, but more will appear).
>
> Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4EF0AF7E.2060209@gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/4EF0AF7E.2060209@gmail.com
On 19 December 2011 14:55, Konstantinos Margaritis
<markos@genesi-usa.com> wrote:
> On 19 December 2011 01:55, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:
>> Please have a look at the gcc-4.7 package in experimental, update patches (hurd,
>> kfreebsd, ARM is fixed in svn), and investigate the build failures (currently
>> ia64, but more will appear).
>
> Attached is the build failure on armhf (clean chroot with all bdeps satisfied).
Just tested 4.7-20111222-1 as well, it built fine, installed and
tested 5 known gcc ICEs (ace, webkit, 2 neon-related ones, a gfortran
one) and all but one neon ICE were fixed
Regards
Konstantinos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: CABSEVwt_QDASf6hG_ev2e3VVExDnnrXdvSqJerfbz6RBAE4HW Q@mail.gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/CABSEVwt_QDASf6hG_ev2e3VVExDnnrXdvSqJerfbz6RBAE4HW Q@mail.gmail.com