Bug#632938: fix
On 07/09/2011 10:05 PM, Matthias Berndt wrote:
> I mailed Jason Merrill about this, as he wrote the patch that broke it. He > told me he fixed it in revision 176087 of the 4.6 branch. Could you package > that fix? I would prefer if that would be tractable by an upstream report. I currently can't see any connection about the upstream commit and the debian report :-/ Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: 4E18CDB1.9030203@debian.org">http://lists.debian.org/4E18CDB1.9030203@debian.org |
Bug#632938: fix
> I would prefer if that would be tractable by an upstream report. I
> currently can't see any connection about the upstream commit and the > debian report :-/ The commit adds a regression test which exhibits the exact same behaviour as the test case I've sent you. It compiles fine without -std=c++0x, and if you compile it with -std=c++0x, it refuses the program with the error message "temporary of non-literal type ‘<whatever>’ in a constant expression". This seems like a pretty strong connection to me. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: 201107100644.59976.matthias_berndt@gmx.de">http://lists.debian.org/201107100644.59976.matthias_berndt@gmx.de |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:27 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.