--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4D861A4B.4020506@debian.org">http://lists.debian.org/4D861A4B.4020506@debian.org
That's the GPREL16 relocation truncation error which is reputedly due to
a bug in the linker optimiser. Linking with -Wl,--no-relax resolves
those (presumably producing suboptimal, but at least working, code).
Cheers
Michael.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4D87125C.1040705@orcon.net.nz">http://lists.debian.org/4D87125C.1040705@orcon.net.nz
03-21-2011, 11:19 AM
Uros Bizjak
gcc build failures on alpha
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-4.6&suite=experimental
>
> Bootstrap comparison failure!
> gcc/opts.o differs
> make[4]: *** [compare] Error 1
Hm, 4.6.0-prerelease works for me [1].
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-snapshot
>
> fails to build with a link error.
Also mainline, but ATM a patch from [2] is needed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: AANLkTikiqHn8ud3Ma58szvPu2kqwgFVgaD6BUhbs8kzf@mail .gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikiqHn8ud3Ma58szvPu2kqwgFVgaD6BUhbs8kzf@mail .gmail.com
03-21-2011, 11:31 AM
Matthias Klose
gcc build failures on alpha
On 21.03.2011 13:19, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-4.6&suite=experimental
>>
>> Bootstrap comparison failure!
>> gcc/opts.o differs
>> make[4]: *** [compare] Error 1
>
> Hm, 4.6.0-prerelease works for me [1].
maybe alpha-no-ev4-directive.diff targeting to ev4 makes a difference?
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-snapshot
>>
>> fails to build with a link error.
>
> Also mainline, but ATM a patch from [2] is needed.
>
> [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-03/msg02077.html
> [2] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2011-03/msg02185.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4D87452E.6080109@debian.org">http://lists.debian.org/4D87452E.6080109@debian.org
06-04-2011, 04:33 AM
Michael Cree
gcc build failures on alpha
On 22/03/11 01:31, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 21.03.2011 13:19, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:
>>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-4.6&suite=experimental
>>>
>>> Bootstrap comparison failure!
>>> gcc/opts.o differs
>>> make[4]: *** [compare] Error 1
I see gcc-4.6 still FTBFS on alpha with the boostrap comparison failure.
> maybe alpha-no-ev4-directive.diff targeting to ev4 makes a difference?
No, it's not that. Nor any of the other Debian patches. Interestingly
it compiles with upstream sources (well, it fails at a later stage with
a linker internal error but that's another story) if one just configures
with ./configure. But if one uses the Debian options used to configure
[1] then upstream source also has the bootstrap comparison failure.
Comparing gcc/opts.o from stage 3 against stage 2 by the following:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4DE9B590.7070302@orcon.net.nz">http://lists.debian.org/4DE9B590.7070302@orcon.net.nz