Linux Archive

Linux Archive (http://www.linux-archive.org/)
-   Debian dpkg (http://www.linux-archive.org/debian-dpkg/)
-   -   Please give back firebird2.5 on s390x (http://www.linux-archive.org/debian-dpkg/685550-please-give-back-firebird2-5-s390x.html)

Damyan Ivanov 07-20-2012 10:37 AM

Please give back firebird2.5 on s390x
 
wb gb firebird2.5_2.5.2~svn+54698.ds4-1 . s390x

The regular build[1] failed with a very strange error in the package
creation phase:

dpkg-shlibdeps: error: dpkg-query --control-path libicu48:s390x symbols died from signal 11

[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=firebird2.5&arch=s390x&ver=2.5.2%7Es vn%2B54698.ds4-1&stamp=1341081509

Searching other build logs or dpkg bugs showed nothing, so my
assumption is that this is a transient problem that can be fixed by
retrying the build.

Should the rebuild fail again at the same place, I'll file a bug to
dpkg. Cc-ing dpkg-maintainers in case they want to investigate
further.

Thanks!

Philipp Kern 07-20-2012 01:04 PM

Please give back firebird2.5 on s390x
 
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:37:05PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> wb gb firebird2.5_2.5.2~svn+54698.ds4-1 . s390x
>
> The regular build[1] failed with a very strange error in the package
> creation phase:
>
> dpkg-shlibdeps: error: dpkg-query --control-path libicu48:s390x symbols died from signal 11
>
> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=firebird2.5&arch=s390x&ver=2.5.2%7Es vn%2B54698.ds4-1&stamp=1341081509
>
> Searching other build logs or dpkg bugs showed nothing, so my
> assumption is that this is a transient problem that can be fixed by
> retrying the build.
>
> Should the rebuild fail again at the same place, I'll file a bug to
> dpkg. Cc-ing dpkg-maintainers in case they want to investigate
> further.

It's more likely a port issue than an issue in dpkg, I think. Given back.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

Guillem Jover 07-20-2012 01:35 PM

Please give back firebird2.5 on s390x
 
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 13:37:05 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> wb gb firebird2.5_2.5.2~svn+54698.ds4-1 . s390x
>
> The regular build[1] failed with a very strange error in the package
> creation phase:
>
> dpkg-shlibdeps: error: dpkg-query --control-path libicu48:s390x symbols died from signal 11
>
> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=firebird2.5&arch=s390x&ver=2.5.2%7Es vn%2B54698.ds4-1&stamp=1341081509
>
> Searching other build logs or dpkg bugs showed nothing, so my
> assumption is that this is a transient problem that can be fixed by
> retrying the build.
>
> Should the rebuild fail again at the same place, I'll file a bug to
> dpkg. Cc-ing dpkg-maintainers in case they want to investigate
> further.

ISTR other segfaults in other dpkg code paths on s390x (maybe I'm just
misremembering), if that's the case that might hint at a deeper
problem in the architecture, hardware, kernel, glibc, etc?

regards,
guillem


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20120720133501.GA11437@gaara.hadrons.org">http://lists.debian.org/20120720133501.GA11437@gaara.hadrons.org

Philipp Kern 07-20-2012 02:20 PM

Please give back firebird2.5 on s390x
 
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:35:01PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> ISTR other segfaults in other dpkg code paths on s390x (maybe I'm just
> misremembering), if that's the case that might hint at a deeper
> problem in the architecture, hardware, kernel, glibc, etc?

You'd be surprised, however, about how many failures are indeed due to people
not assuming the right things when dealing with 64bit big endian.

However, why I mentioned it: As least on s390 we have unexplained,
non-reproducable segfaults in malloc sometimes, retrying always fixes the
problem. I'm not certain if this affects s390x too.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

Guillem Jover 07-21-2012 04:14 AM

Please give back firebird2.5 on s390x
 
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:20:24 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:35:01PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > ISTR other segfaults in other dpkg code paths on s390x (maybe I'm just
> > misremembering), if that's the case that might hint at a deeper
> > problem in the architecture, hardware, kernel, glibc, etc?
>
> You'd be surprised, however, about how many failures are indeed due to people
> not assuming the right things when dealing with 64bit big endian.

Oh I'd not be surprised in general, although I would be a bit for dpkg
at least, given that there's supposedly ppc64 and sparc64 around
somewhere.

> However, why I mentioned it: As least on s390 we have unexplained,
> non-reproducable segfaults in malloc sometimes, retrying always fixes the
> problem. I'm not certain if this affects s390x too.

Maybe it was on s390 logs I saw those segfaults. In any case it might
be a good idea to enable core dumps on the buildds there, if they are
not already enabled?

regards,
guillem


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20120721041441.GA16387@gaara.hadrons.org">http://lists.debian.org/20120721041441.GA16387@gaara.hadrons.org


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:43 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.