draft ballot: please rule on how to implement debian/rules build-arch
[ moving to debian-dpkg, it's not interesting for tech-ctte anymore ]
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Guillem Jover wrote: > Yes, I reorganized my thoughts while sleeping, in essence I'm mostly > concerned about the *possibility* of building/using old sources and > binaries, and as long as there's a way, even if behind --force- or > other similar options I don't have any problem with that. OK, that makes sense. But this is something we can take care of when we're going to drop this make -qn check. > > +unless ($buildtarget eq "build" or scalar(@debian_rules) > 1) { > > + # Verify that build-{arch,indep} are supported. If not, fallback to build. > > + # This is a temporary measure to not break too many packages on a flag day. > > It still would be nice to wrap this under 80 chars. :) By my vim's count, they are at 78 and 79 chars. :-) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/liberation/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: 20120127084653.GD31841@rivendell.home.ouaza.com">h ttp://lists.debian.org/20120127084653.GD31841@rivendell.home.ouaza.com |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:29 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.