dpkg's main repository branch, master, updated. 18.104.22.168-319-gbf9cefe
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 08:25:13 +0000, Rapha√ęl Hertzog wrote:
> > The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> > commit 9dcb50a59414e1fe0e6a8a4c8ee9f59d10706396
> > Author: Rapha√ęl Hertzog <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Date: Mon Sep 12 09:42:11 2011 +0200
> > update-alternatives: new non-regression test
> > This one catches the regression introduced in
> > 6c481e19a532080643e3cf5c76760df8009ea2c7 and fixed in
> > 9dceac005a0331ceb840f9c8273c7fd195413516.
> > It should also catch the former problem of passing NULL to stat() (via
> > new_file). But this did not trigger any segfault, merely a failure
> > with EFAULT.
> Hrmm, should not have trusted the existing code when changing to
> xreadlink. Because even if on Linux (and other kernels) it returns
> EFAULT, due to the argument being handled directly by the kernel,
> there's no guarantee it cannot segfault, and the system has all the
> right to do so, as such that's not a portable assumption to make.
> For example it *does* segfault on the Hurd.
Yeah, there definitely was a theoretical bug there. But in practice
it's almost never triggered as the alternative link usually only exists
if the corresponding /etc/alternatives link is there too.
Rapha√ęl Hertzog ‚óą Debian Developer
Follow my Debian News ‚Ė∂ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
‚Ė∂ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Fran√ßais)
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com
Archive: 20110913055101.GN13263@rivendell.home.ouaza.com">h ttp://lists.debian.org/20110913055101.GN13263@rivendell.home.ouaza.com