I think it's wrong to (have to) add the Multi-Arch field to architecture
all packages. I would rather suggest that we consider them as
automatically satisfying any dependency (i.e. the Multi-Arch: foreign
would be implicit).
What do other people think?
An architecture all package that provides something arch specific is
very rare and it's often meant to be used in situation where you precisely
want to make this available to other architectures (i.e. syslinux-common).
So I don't think that we have to go through all the trouble to whitelist
them one by one.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110210160011.GB22833@rivendell.home.ouaza.com">h ttp://lists.debian.org/20110210160011.GB22833@rivendell.home.ouaza.com