FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Debian > Debian dpkg

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 02-27-2010, 02:01 AM
Guillem Jover
 
Default License audit on dpkg source tree

On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 19:47:44 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Ok cool, I'll be applying tthe following patch then.

This is done now.

thanks,
guillem


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20100227030142.GF27896@gaara.hadrons.org">http://lists.debian.org/20100227030142.GF27896@gaara.hadrons.org
 
Old 04-15-2010, 01:21 PM
Raphael Hertzog
 
Default License audit on dpkg source tree

Hi,

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is something that has been bothering me for a long time, so the
> other day I sat down and did a full license audit of the sources.
>
> I've cleaned up the license headers and added missing ones, as a side
> effect “licensecheck -r dpkg” works better now. There's still lots of
> copyright statements missing, I have a patch around to add few, but
> every file takes time digging, and there's probably more urgent things
> to tend to. I'd like to get all GPL code unified as GPL-2+,
> eventually, though.
>
> The remaining issues, which might need asking people around are:
>
> * dselect/methods/multicd/*: GPL-2 only
>
> The dselect-multicd method from the dpkg-multicd package, states on
> its debian/copyright to be based on builtin methods from dselect,
> but then has a license of GPL-2 only, while dselect has GPL-2+.
>
> * dselect/methods/Debian/Dselect/Ftp.pm: No header
> dselect/methods/ftp/*: GPL (no version)
>
> The dselect-ftp method from the dpkg-ftp package, states on its
> debian/copyright file to be under the GPL-2 only. Ideally this
> would have the same terms as the rest of the code base, in case
> code needs to be reused for example.

I'm ccing all the people listed in the copyright. Please respond and
tell us whether you agree to change the license of your code to "GPLv2 or
later" instead of the "GPLv2 only"?

I'm expecting some bounces, most likely that the email of Andy Guy and
Heiko Schlitterman are not valid anymore. I found an alternative email for
Heiko but no clear trace of Andy Guy (the name is quite common
unfortunately). Does anyone know how to contact him?

As far I am concerned, I agree with changing the license of all my code to
GPLv2 or later.

Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog

Like what I do? Sponsor me: http://ouaza.com/wp/2010/01/05/5-years-of-freexian/
My Debian goals: http://ouaza.com/wp/2010/01/09/debian-related-goals-for-2010/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20100415132140.GB3084@rivendell">http://lists.debian.org/20100415132140.GB3084@rivendell
 
Old 04-15-2010, 01:30 PM
Martin Schulze
 
Default License audit on dpkg source tree

Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > This is something that has been bothering me for a long time, so the
> > other day I sat down and did a full license audit of the sources.
> >
> > I've cleaned up the license headers and added missing ones, as a side
> > effect ???licensecheck -r dpkg??? works better now. There's still lots of
> > copyright statements missing, I have a patch around to add few, but
> > every file takes time digging, and there's probably more urgent things
> > to tend to. I'd like to get all GPL code unified as GPL-2+,
> > eventually, though.
> >
> > The remaining issues, which might need asking people around are:
> >
> > * dselect/methods/multicd/*: GPL-2 only
> >
> > The dselect-multicd method from the dpkg-multicd package, states on
> > its debian/copyright to be based on builtin methods from dselect,
> > but then has a license of GPL-2 only, while dselect has GPL-2+.
> >
> > * dselect/methods/Debian/Dselect/Ftp.pm: No header
> > dselect/methods/ftp/*: GPL (no version)
> >
> > The dselect-ftp method from the dpkg-ftp package, states on its
> > debian/copyright file to be under the GPL-2 only. Ideally this
> > would have the same terms as the rest of the code base, in case
> > code needs to be reused for example.
>
> I'm ccing all the people listed in the copyright. Please respond and
> tell us whether you agree to change the license of your code to "GPLv2 or
> later" instead of the "GPLv2 only"?

I agree.

Regards,

Joey

--
The MS-DOS filesystem is nice for removable media. -- H. Peter Anvin
 
Old 04-15-2010, 02:11 PM
Heiko Schlittermann
 
Default License audit on dpkg source tree

Hi,

Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> (Do 15 Apr 2010 15:21:40 CEST):
>
> I'm expecting some bounces, most likely that the email of Andy Guy and
> Heiko Schlitterman are not valid anymore. I found an alternative email for
> Heiko but no clear trace of Andy Guy (the name is quite common
> unfortunately). Does anyone know how to contact him?

hs@schlittermann.de is the most correct address.

> As far I am concerned, I agree with changing the license of all my code to
> GPLv2 or later.

Me too.

--
Heiko
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:59 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org