Comments+blank line in debian/control: Clarification in policy or MBF?
While rebuilding our archive using pbuilder I noticed that all packages
build-depending on gnome-pkg-tools failed to build. That led me to filing
#684503, which I'll quote here for convenience:
| The file control.header ends with an empty blank line. As the contents of that
| file is prepended to debian/control for packages making using of
| gnome-pkg-tools, this results in
| <blank line>
| <actual debian/control contents>
| By policy, blank lines separate paragraphs, comments are discarded, so we end up
| with an empty first paragraph. Policy, however, requires that the *first*
| paragraph contains essential package information (Policy 5.2).
| The current setup breaks at least pbuilder's build-dependency parsing, which
| relies on this fact.
| If you believe that an empty first paragraph should not be considered a
| paragraph, please reassign to policy, asking for clarification that it's the
| *first non-empty* paragraph.
Ubuntu have fixed this bug in their version of gnome-pkg-tools already, but:
- the problem affects all packages *build-depending* on gnome-pkg-tools, thus
I'd actually have to do an MBF (it's more than 160 packages)
- some other packages also contain comments and a blank line before the actual
contents in debian/control (so at the very least I should be filing bugs
against these as well)
- it seems only pbuilder is really strict in its interpretation of policy here,
but effectively that means that all our other build infrastructure doing
parsing of debian/control is *not* policy-compliant
Taking a pragmatic position, it would be best to have policy acknowledge the
fact that empty paragraphs don't count, and get the parser in pbuilder fixed.
Opinions would be much appreciated.
|All times are GMT. The time now is 07:26 PM.|
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.