Hi,

it is the third time that I've got this type of rejection. I faced
it two times with package gnumed-client and now with a different package.

Is anybody able to explain this and how can I avoid the problem. I
just builded the package with an up to date pbuilder.

Puzzled

Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:02:03 +0000
From: Debian Installer <installer@ftp-master.debian.org>
To: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>,
Debian-Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Subject: [Debian-med-packaging] epcr_2.3.9-1_i386.changes REJECTED


Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed.
Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: actual file size (1289) does not match size (1052) in .changes sha1
Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha256 check failed.
Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: actual file size (1289) does not match size (1052) in .changes sha256


===

If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.

_______________________________________________
Debian-med-packaging mailing list
Debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

On Wed Apr 16 17:19, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it is the third time that I've got this type of rejection. I faced
> it two times with package gnumed-client and now with a different package.
>
> Is anybody able to explain this and how can I avoid the problem. I
> just builded the package with an up to date pbuilder.

do you have updated devscripts? debsign signs the dsc then updates the
md5 hash in the changes before signing that. It needs to update the sha
checks as well. The latest devscripts does.

Matt
--
Matthew Johnson