Conflict usr/bin/ninja vs usr/sbin/ninja ?
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:41:05AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> I just sponsored the ninja-build package. I realize now that I may
> have missed one point: does it need to conflict with package ninja ?
> ninja-build will provide usr/bin/ninja, while ninja provides
> The policy requires a Conflicts only when two packages provide the
> same file . It is implicitly assumed that file means full path to
> file IMHO. However for filename in PATH, this might be an issue.
While, as Arno mentioned, you are not allowed to use that name, this is
a case where it would be good to ask the maintainer of "ninja" the root
process logger to migrate his executable to something else.
As a "make" replacement, "ninja"[-build] is something one runs from the
command line tens or hundreds of times a day. The other ninja is a daemon
that's never run interactively, and its executable is referenced only from
an init script.
One such case in the past was "git" vs "gnuit" -- and there, the other tool
is something interactive, with 1367 popcon score. "ninja" has mere 39
Copyright and patents were never about promoting culture and innovations;
from the very start they were legalized bribes to give the king some income
and to let businesses get rid of competition. For some history, please read