Bug#685042: ITP: libpam-ssh -- Authenticate using SSH keys
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <antti-juhani@kaijanaho.fi> (16/08/2012):
> There is no ambiguity. The package is present in unstable and thus is not
> "removed" in the sense that word is commonly used without qualifiers. (The
> proper way to describe what happened to the package is "removed from testing" -
> a release engineering action that doesn't imply any change in a package's
> maintainership.)
Bug#685042: ITP: libpam-ssh -- Authenticate using SSH keys
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:41:08PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> What let you think this?
Carelessness in investigating (looked at
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html, noticed that the last news
entry was removal from testing and did not read closely enough to notice the
unstable removal notice below it - in retrospect, I should have expected such a
pattern, as removals from testing are often preceded by removals from
unstable).
Sorry for the noise.
(I do not need a personal CC, by the way. I am subscribed.)
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finland
http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/antti-juhani/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20120816155600.GE2585@kukkavihko.kaijanaho.fi">htt p://lists.debian.org/20120816155600.GE2585@kukkavihko.kaijanaho.fi
08-16-2012, 04:06 PM
Thomas Goirand
Bug#685042: ITP: libpam-ssh -- Authenticate using SSH keys
On 08/16/2012 11:42 PM, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:39:50PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>> According to its PTS ( http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html ):
>> [2011-12-03] libpam-ssh REMOVED from testing (Britney)
>> [2011-12-02] Removed 1.92-14 from unstable (Alexander Reichle-Schmehl)
>>
>> So I guess it must be considered as removed.
>>
> Yes, you are right. Sorry for my careless reading of that page.
>
> In any case, no ambiguity, it seems. I don't think a package's presence in
> stable or oldstable alone is a problem.
>
On my side, I got fooled by reading too fast:
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libpam-ssh&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all
The package is in SID, but only on few arch.
Which makes me wonder: WHY ? How does such things happen?
Is this because such ports aren't part of official Debian anymore?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 502D1AA1.1010908@goirand.fr">http://lists.debian.org/502D1AA1.1010908@goirand.fr
08-16-2012, 04:49 PM
Andrei POPESCU
Bug#685042: ITP: libpam-ssh -- Authenticate using SSH keys
On Jo, 16 aug 12, 07:40:52, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> Is this about using removable media to store the SSH private key to
> login to machines which only have the public key? That would be useful
> (but isn't that covered by existing PAM support?)
Well, by putting the SSH private key on a removable media one can get a
poor-man's version smart card, similar with libpam-rsa, but you get the
added benefit of having the key automatically added to the ssh-agent.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic