tasksel: Default desktop: Gnome→Xfce
Hi,
On 03.08.2012 23:28, Michael Biebl wrote: > Seriously, I'd just drop our CD1 installs and only provide a net-install > image and a DVD image for desktop installations. Is there any serious survey how established DVD drives (and writers) are these days? CD images might be obsolete some day, but we should be sure (virtually) nobody notices once we drop it. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D |
tasksel: Default desktop: Gnome→Xfce
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Arno Töll <arno@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > On 03.08.2012 23:28, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Seriously, I'd just drop our CD1 installs and only provide a net-install >> image and a DVD image for desktop installations. > > Is there any serious survey how established DVD drives (and writers) are > these days? CD images might be obsolete some day, but we should be sure > (virtually) nobody notices once we drop it. I don't know about serious surveys, but flash drives are ubiquitous and have large storage. Some (many?) laptops don't have optical drives either. For D-I, I would pick the most common USB flash drive size (perhaps 2.0 GB) and target that. -mz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: CAOLfK3U2Er-V1xCYUZptMjsKN_aMiikcpa_kMGbfJnbp4MF4GA@mail.gmail .com">http://lists.debian.org/CAOLfK3U2Er-V1xCYUZptMjsKN_aMiikcpa_kMGbfJnbp4MF4GA@mail.gmail .com |
tasksel: Default desktop: Gnome→Xfce
On 04.08.2012 00:03, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Arno Töll <arno@debian.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 03.08.2012 23:28, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Seriously, I'd just drop our CD1 installs and only provide a net-install >>> image and a DVD image for desktop installations. >> >> Is there any serious survey how established DVD drives (and writers) are >> these days? CD images might be obsolete some day, but we should be sure >> (virtually) nobody notices once we drop it. Maybe this wasn't entirely obvious. I didn't say to drop CD images completely. Just that CD1 is no longer sufficient to provide a full desktop environment installation and instead promote an alternative installation image for desktop installations. > I don't know about serious surveys, but flash drives are ubiquitous > and have large storage. Some (many?) laptops don't have optical drives > either. For D-I, I would pick the most common USB flash drive size > (perhaps 2.0 GB) and target that. That sounds like an interesting idea. Even if a default DVD-RW would provide more space, having only 1 GB instead of 4.4 GB to download makes a difference. 2.0 GB would even probably be enough to fit GNOME and KDE (and maybe other alternatives) on that image. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? |
tasksel: Default desktop: Gnome→Xfce
On 03/08/2012 23:24, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 04.08.2012 00:03, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Arno Töll <arno@debian.org> wrote: Hi, On 03.08.2012 23:28, Michael Biebl wrote: Seriously, I'd just drop our CD1 installs and only provide a net-install image and a DVD image for desktop installations. Is there any serious survey how established DVD drives (and writers) are these days? CD images might be obsolete some day, but we should be sure (virtually) nobody notices once we drop it. Maybe this wasn't entirely obvious. I didn't say to drop CD images completely. Just that CD1 is no longer sufficient to provide a full desktop environment installation and instead promote an alternative installation image for desktop installations. I don't know about serious surveys, but flash drives are ubiquitous and have large storage. Some (many?) laptops don't have optical drives either. For D-I, I would pick the most common USB flash drive size (perhaps 2.0 GB) and target that. That sounds like an interesting idea. Even if a default DVD-RW would provide more space, having only 1 GB instead of 4.4 GB to download makes a difference. 2.0 GB would even probably be enough to fit GNOME and KDE (and maybe other alternatives) on that image. Michael Also, with the package survey, could you just work out what packages tend to be downloaded together and use that to make specialised CDs for a purpose, instead of numbered CDs. Jamie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: 501C5736.3040001@jatos.co.uk">http://lists.debian.org/501C5736.3040001@jatos.co.uk |
tasksel: Default desktop: Gnome→Xfce
IMHO, Package downloader for *offline* installation instead of
full-desktop-featured CD images. And I think it could be good to build their own installation images using jigsaw (or downloads to their own hard drive) before offline installation. It also promotes the use of on-line installation and decrease the number of use-once-then-throw-away optical media. For default desktop, is it OK to separate into different desktop systems? Debian should give people choice for their taste instead of a default option. -- Yao Wei -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJkNRTHZ9dBcMgG=9Xe1666j-bHSHi7ijGsn10yGDB422ePQdg@mail.gmail.com |
tasksel: Default desktop: Gnome→Xfce
Le samedi 04 août 2012 * 00:24 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit :
> > I don't know about serious surveys, but flash drives are ubiquitous > > and have large storage. Some (many?) laptops don't have optical drives > > either. For D-I, I would pick the most common USB flash drive size > > (perhaps 2.0 GB) and target that. > > That sounds like an interesting idea. Even if a default DVD-RW would > provide more space, having only 1 GB instead of 4.4 GB to download makes > a difference. 2.0 GB would even probably be enough to fit GNOME and KDE > (and maybe other alternatives) on that image. AFAIK debian-cd now produces 1 GiB, 2 GiB and 4 GiB images for use with USB sticks. -- .'`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1344071350.4874.3.camel@tomoe |
tasksel: Default desktop: Gnome→Xfce
Le vendredi 03 août 2012 * 23:28 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit :
> And in wheezy+1(or 2,...), when XFCE has outgrown CD1, we switch to E17, > or whatever the tasksel maintainers prefer at that time. Sounds like a > great plan to base our default desktop on the size of a CD or the mood > of a single maintainer and switch arbitrarily between releases. Since lenny, our default installation has always been about the mood of a single maintainer. This is for example why we still don’t have tmpfs by default. -- .'`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1344071454.4874.4.camel@tomoe |
tasksel: Default desktop: Gnome→Xfce
Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> (04/08/2012):
> This is for example why we still don’t have tmpfs by default. Your example is wrong. On a freshly-installed system: tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=161324k) Mraw, KiBi. |
tasksel: Default desktop: Gnome→Xfce
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 12:18:45PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> (04/08/2012): > > This is for example why we still don’t have tmpfs by default. > > Your example is wrong. > > On a freshly-installed system: > tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=161324k) This is only until sysvinit migrates to testing though. We did (regrettably, IMO) change back the default. Roger -- .'`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: 20120804111008.GS25141@codelibre.net">http://lists.debian.org/20120804111008.GS25141@codelibre.net |
tasksel: Default desktop: Gnome→Xfce
Joss wrote:
>Le samedi 04 août 2012 Ã* 00:24 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : >> > I don't know about serious surveys, but flash drives are ubiquitous >> > and have large storage. Some (many?) laptops don't have optical drives >> > either. For D-I, I would pick the most common USB flash drive size >> > (perhaps 2.0 GB) and target that. >> >> That sounds like an interesting idea. Even if a default DVD-RW would >> provide more space, having only 1 GB instead of 4.4 GB to download makes >> a difference. 2.0 GB would even probably be enough to fit GNOME and KDE >> (and maybe other alternatives) on that image. > >AFAIK debian-cd now produces 1 GiB, 2 GiB and 4 GiB images for use with >USB sticks. We don't *yet*. The code is there (as mentioned in the DebConf BoF), but I've not yet seen a consensus over exactly what people want. Currently, I'm thinking an extra 2GB image would be useful. We *do* already have a 4GB image (the first DVD image is deliberately down-sized to 4GB) and CD#1 is close-ish to 1GB. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com Google-bait: http://www.debian.org/CD/free-linux-cd Debian does NOT ship free CDs. Please do NOT contact the mailing lists asking us to send them to you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: E1Sxf0M-0005Ig-5Z@mail.einval.com">http://lists.debian.org/E1Sxf0M-0005Ig-5Z@mail.einval.com |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 10:14 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.