Bug#682502: ITP: cream-terminal -- Terminal application for the Cream Desktop Environment (was: Bug#682502: ITP: console -- Terminal application for the Cream Desktop Environment)
Hi Andrey et al.
On Mo 23 Jul 2012 14:34:58 CEST Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:29:23PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
It would probably make sense to rename the console executable (as
provided by upstream) to cream-terminal then?
Of course (and poke upstream to do that, not just rename it in the
package).
Or will Debian accept an binary with the name of console in /usr/bin?
I was going to answer "of course no" but then I've found /usr/bin/console
in conserver-client package. That's a bad idea anyway.
The package has been retitled to ,,cream-terminal' (I might have
forgotten to Cc: d-d ML for that, sorry), I encourage upstream to
rename the binary (and maybe the upstream project), as well.
OT: Same with melange -> cream-melange (though melange as binary name
is not in use...).
Bug#682502: ITP: cream-terminal -- Terminal application for the Cream Desktop Environment (was: Bug#682502: ITP: console -- Terminal application for the Cream Desktop Environment)
