Bug#682502: ITP: console -- Terminal application for the Cream Desktop Environment
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:29:23PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> It would probably make sense to rename the console executable (as
> provided by upstream) to cream-terminal then?
Of course (and poke upstream to do that, not just rename it in the
> Or will Debian accept an binary with the name of console in /usr/bin?
I was going to answer "of course no" but then I've found /usr/bin/console
in conserver-client package. That's a bad idea anyway.