Use of the "general" and "base" packages ( general: after about 1 month...)
Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sonntag, 24. Juni 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> retitle 678519 after about a month, routing gets wedged
>> # not a general problem affecting a large portion of the archive
>> reassign 678519 base
> reassigning bugs from general to base is pretty useless, as both pseudo-
> packages bugs are "maintained" by the same persons...
> Basically the base-pseudo package is pretty useless as well, all it's
> (current) bugs should probabyl be carefully assigned to the kernel, for
> #678519 I just wasnt sure yet if its really a kernel or user configuration
> The general pseudo-package has some approriate bugs OTOH.
> But mostly bugs filed against those two pseudo-packages really need to be
> assigned to a real package.
I figured the discussion of which package is resposible was more on
topic for virtual-pkg-base-maintainers@ than debian-devel@. Though I
could easily be wrong.
In any event, I reassigned the bug to the kernel a few minutes later.
Hoping that clarifies,
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
|All times are GMT. The time now is 05:10 PM.|
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.