Ian Jackson [2012-06-15 17:18 +0100]:
> > I saw that coming: There would be little dispute about adding a
> > header, but lots of difficulty to find a good name. :-) Perhaps we
> > should think about an actual name for DEP-8 first (similar to what we
> > had with DEP-5 -> "copyright 1.0 format"), and then use an
> > abbreviation of that for the XS-Testsuite: value?
> Is there some reason why we can't use "autopkgtest" ? It's a pretty
> boring name really and I don't mind it being reused for both spec and
> implementation. That's a thing we do quite often anyway. Eg "dpkg" :-)
FTR, I think "autopkgtest" as a spec name is just fine. It conveys
what the standard is about rather well in a really short name.
Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org