On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 20, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de> wrote:
>
> > But I guess the solution for this would be to have udev make /dev/r/usr
> > the real device and /dev/mapper/r-usr a symlink.
> No, because udev does not creates/renames devices anymore.
> (This makes devtmpfs mandatory, BTW.)

Marco, at which point did Debian userspace started requiring devtmpfs?

I am not arguing about it, against it, or for it. I just need this
information to keep it in mind when compiling custom kernels.

--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20120120174812.GC18413@khazad-dum.debian.net">http://lists.debian.org/20120120174812.GC18413@khazad-dum.debian.net

On Jan 20, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> wrote:

> Marco, at which point did Debian userspace started requiring devtmpfs?
The next udev release.

--
ciao,
Marco

On 20.01.2012 21:53, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 20, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> Marco, at which point did Debian userspace started requiring devtmpfs?
> The next udev release.

The same which will move things to /usr ?

Thanks,

/mjt


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4F1A982E.6040009@msgid.tls.msk.ru">http://lists.debian.org/4F1A982E.6040009@msgid.tls.msk.ru