Bug#637892: ITP: python-formalchemy -- auto-generation and customizable form
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist Owner: XuZhiXiang <shell909090@gmail.com> I'm a new packager in debian, and I wanna make this package * Package name : python-formalchemy Version : 1.4.1 Upstream Author : Alexandre Conrad, Jonathan Ellis, Gal Pasgrimaud <formalchemy at googlegroups com> * URL : http://docs.formalchemy.org/ * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Description : auto-generation and customizable form FormAlchemy greatly speeds development with SQLAlchemy mapped classes (models) in a HTML forms environment. It also provides support for CouchDB and a Pylons administration interface. FormAlchemy eliminates boilerplate by autogenerating HTML input fields >From a given model. FormAlchemy will try to figure out what kind of HTML code should be returned by introspecting the model's properties and generate ready-to-use HTML code that will fit the developer's application. Of course, FormAlchemy can't figure out everything, i.e, the developer might want to display only a few columns from the given model. Thus, FormAlchemy is also highly customizable. By the way, this package seems in requested packages list. here is the bug. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526936 As a new maintainer, I'm not so sure what need to do next, any help will be appreciated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: 20110815152246.23352.8141.reportbug@debox.lan">htt p://lists.debian.org/20110815152246.23352.8141.reportbug@debox.lan |
Bug#637892: ITP: python-formalchemy -- auto-generation and customizable form
Hi,
> By the way, this package seems in requested packages list. here is the > bug. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526936 > > As a new maintainer, I'm not so sure what need to do next, any help > will be appreciated. As there was already a RFP, you should have not opened a new bug[0], but rather retitled the RFP to ITP and assigned you as owner by sending an email to BTS control bot[1]. But, considering that you have already opened it, you can merge both bugs[2] and that will do. Hope that helps. Regards, -- Arnaud Fontaine [0] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ [1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control [2] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#merge |
Bug#637892: ITP: python-formalchemy -- auto-generation and customizable form
Sorry to bother you, but my merge has failed, and I don't know why.
I retitled this bug(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526936 ) and make myself as owner, but merge 526936 637892 has failed. According this article(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#merge ), bugs which I try to merge has same state, all not marked as forwarded, all of the same severity. But does it has assigned? And, I almost finish my job. But which bugnumber should I fill into changelog? The new one or both? Thanks for help. 2011/8/17 Arnaud Fontaine <arnau@debian.org>: > Hi, > >> * By the way, this package seems in requested packages list. here is the >> bug. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526936 >> >> * As a new maintainer, I'm not so *sure what need to do next, any help >> will be appreciated. > > As there was already a RFP, you should have not opened a new bug[0], but > rather retitled the *RFP to ITP and assigned you as *owner by sending an > email to BTS control bot[1]. > > But, considering *that you *have already opened *it, you can *merge both > bugs[2] and that will do. > > Hope that helps. > > Regards, > -- > Arnaud Fontaine > > [0] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ > [1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control > [2] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#merge > -- *能者*所求，饱食而遨游，泛若不 之舟 blog: http://shell909090.com/blog/ twitter: http://twitter.com/shell909090 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: CADexTbxTSnDYkFGtwauJVOo-nLYzNiSD281vr05afuT4ivXdzg@mail.gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/CADexTbxTSnDYkFGtwauJVOo-nLYzNiSD281vr05afuT4ivXdzg@mail.gmail.com |
Bug#637892: ITP: python-formalchemy -- auto-generation and customizable form
Hi,
> Sorry to bother you, but my merge has failed, and I don't know why. I > retitled this > bug(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526936 ) and make > myself as owner, but merge 526936 637892 has failed. No problem at all. As far as I can see on the bug report, it worked because it displays 'Merged with...'. > And, I almost finish my job. But which bugnumber should I fill into > changelog? The new one or both? Only one (any of them), as explained there[0]. Regards, -- Arnaud Fontaine [0] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#merge |
Bug#637892: ITP: python-formalchemy -- auto-generation and customizable form
Hi there!
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:52:47 +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: >> Sorry to bother you, but my merge has failed, and I don't know why. I >> retitled this >> bug(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526936 ) and make >> myself as owner, but merge 526936 637892 has failed. > > No problem at all. As far as I can see on the bug report, it worked > because it displays 'Merged with...'. No, the merge command Shell Xu issued contained a non-breaking space, thus it did not work: <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=41;mbox=yes;bug=526936> Then Aron Xu fixed it with a forcemerge (AFAIK not strictly needed in this case): <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=43;mbox=yes;bug=526936> >> And, I almost finish my job. But which bugnumber should I fill into >> changelog? The new one or both? > > Only one (any of them), as explained there[0]. While any of them is correct, I would say that chronologically the first one takes precedence ;-) Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca |
Bug#637892: ITP: python-formalchemy -- auto-generation and customizable form
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Shell Xu <shell909090@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry to bother you, but my merge has failed, and I don't know why. > I retitled this > bug(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526936 ) and make > myself as owner, but merge 526936 637892 has failed. > According this article(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#merge > ), bugs which I try to merge has same state, all not marked as > forwarded, all of the same severity. But does it has assigned? > And, I almost finish my job. But which bugnumber should I fill into > changelog? The new one or both? > Thanks for help. > You can close both bug in debian/changelog -- Liang Guo http://bluestone.cublog.cn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: CAJwrgW5BZ2zmEhmRp5zrSQ=HoFME-J5GmYPYi_oOpkPuMk_U3Q@mail.gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/CAJwrgW5BZ2zmEhmRp5zrSQ=HoFME-J5GmYPYi_oOpkPuMk_U3Q@mail.gmail.com |
Bug#637892: ITP: python-formalchemy -- auto-generation and customizable form
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:18:09 +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Shell Xu <shell909090@gmail.com> wrote: And, I almost finish my job. But which bugnumber should I fill into changelog? The new one or both? Thanks for help. You can close both bug in debian/changelog You can, but you'll just generate twice as much mail - the BTS will close A, notice that it's merged with B and close B; then it'll close B, notice that it's merged with A... (thankfully only to one level, rather than recursively). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: 9793007cb00b6b25598430572e29ac42@adsl.funky-badger.org">http://lists.debian.org/9793007cb00b6b25598430572e29ac42@adsl.funky-badger.org |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 06:03 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.