Linux Archive

Linux Archive (http://www.linux-archive.org/)
-   Debian Development (http://www.linux-archive.org/debian-development/)
-   -   limits for package name and version (MBF alert: ... .deb filenames) (http://www.linux-archive.org/debian-development/519078-limits-package-name-version-mbf-alert-deb-filenames.html)

Jon Dowland 04-27-2011 03:09 PM

limits for package name and version (MBF alert: ... .deb filenames)
 
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:31:22PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> Why assume the first version will be >= 1.x? It's not uncommon to use
> 0.x. Using 0~YYMMDD seems a safer option to reduce the chance of
> needing an epoch if/when upstream starts using actual version numbers.

~ sorts after ., so "0~110427" will be considered newer than "0.1". Therefore,
the 0 in 0~YYMMDD is meaningless, and would be no better than ~YYMMDD (which
would still sort after 0.1, and require an epoch).


--
Jon Dowland


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110427150948.GA23005@deckard.alcopop.org">http://lists.debian.org/20110427150948.GA23005@deckard.alcopop.org


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:55 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.