Bug#622172: ITP: git-hg -- Script to track mercurial repositories in git
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist Owner: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> * Package name : git-hg Version : 20110408-1 Upstream Author : Barak A. Pearlmutter <barak+git@cs.nuim.ie> * URL : https://github.com/barak/git-hg * License : Expat Programming Lang: Bash Description : Script to track mercurial repositories in git -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: 20110410172224.9064.43569.reportbug@belkar.wrar.na me">http://lists.debian.org/20110410172224.9064.43569.reportbug@belkar.wrar.na me |
Bug#622172: ITP: git-hg -- Script to track mercurial repositories in git
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:22:24PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> > > * Package name : git-hg > Version : 20110408-1 > Upstream Author : Barak A. Pearlmutter <barak+git@cs.nuim.ie> > * URL : https://github.com/barak/git-hg > * License : Expat > Programming Lang: Bash > Description : Script to track mercurial repositories in git The right approach for mercurial tracking is IMHO https://github.com/SRabbelier/git/tree/remote-hg Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: 20110410175252.GA5936@glandium.org">http://lists.debian.org/20110410175252.GA5936@glandium.org |
Bug#622172: ITP: git-hg -- Script to track mercurial repositories in git
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 07:52:52PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> The right approach for mercurial tracking is IMHO > https://github.com/SRabbelier/git/tree/remote-hg I've asked about the right way to do that at http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/04/msg00171.html yesterday and didn't receive constructive answers there :) If the stuff at your link is a patched git tree instead of a separate piece of software, how can it be used before the patches are applied upstream (and I don't see that they are going to be applied)? Is there anywhere some status report about when will it be available in git? -- WBR, wRAR |
Bug#622172: ITP: git-hg -- Script to track mercurial repositories in git
AFAIK Sverre Rabbelier was hoping to bring remote-hg to some conclusion
by the end of last year so it could get approached git mainline, but that hasn't happened yet unfortunately :-/ Thus, in the absence of proper remote-hg, I would vote for having fast-export based workaround available meanwhile. > Upstream Author : Barak A. Pearlmutter <barak+git@cs.nuim.ie> BTW, Barak is a DD ;-) On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 07:52:52PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > The right approach for mercurial tracking is IMHO > > https://github.com/SRabbelier/git/tree/remote-hg > I've asked about the right way to do that at > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/04/msg00171.html yesterday and > didn't receive constructive answers there :) -- =------------------------------------------------------------------= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: 20110411001155.GA7764@onerussian.com">http://lists.debian.org/20110411001155.GA7764@onerussian.com |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 04:05 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.