Build logs (was: Sourceful uploads)
 

On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:09:05 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:

> > getbuildlog(1) from devscripts downloads (almost, if you ignore a
> > small header/footer) text-versions of build logs.
> it is exactly that header and footer that I was reffering to when I wrote
> “withouth HTML processing”.

Ok. It doesn't really hurt IMO, but that's just me.

> Would it be acceptable to serve the build logs as plain text files ? Would a
> patch be welcome ?

I looks rather easy to strip the HTML, e.g. with the one-line patch
below. I leave it to you if you want to submit it against devscripts
:)

Cheers,
gregor

#v+
--- /usr/bin/getbuildlog 2011-02-09 08:44:23.000000000 +0100
+++ /tmp/getbuildlog 2011-02-15 17:41:51.000000000 +0100
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@
arch=${arch%%&*}
match=`echo $match | sed -e 's/+/%2B/g'`
wget -O "${PACKAGE}_${ver}_${arch}.log" "$BASE/$match&file=log"
+ sed -i -e '0,/<pre>/ d ; /</pre>/,$ d' "${PACKAGE}_${ver}_${arch}.log"
done

rm -f $ALL_LOGS
#v-
--
.'`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
`- NP: Bob Dylan: Talkin' World War III Blues

Build logs (was: Sourceful uploads)
 

Le Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:45:56PM +0100, gregor herrmann a écrit :
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:09:05 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > > getbuildlog(1) from devscripts downloads (almost, if you ignore a
> > > small header/footer) text-versions of build logs.
> > it is exactly that header and footer that I was reffering to when I wrote
> > “withouth HTML processing”.
>
> Ok. It doesn't really hurt IMO, but that's just me.

I still think that it is more straightforward to serve text files as text,
rather than adding html and removing it afterwards. Would it be acceptable for
buildd.debian.org to serve the bzipped plain text logs directly ?

The reason why I am interested in these logs and the signed .changes files is
that I am trying to collect them in the Git repository where the source package
is maintained. I already found it very useful a couple of times to have the
logs ready for being diff'ed (--word-diff=color).

Have a nice day,

--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110216004931.GD21803@merveille.plessy.net">http://lists.debian.org/20110216004931.GD21803@merveille.plessy.net

Build logs (was: Sourceful uploads)
 

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:45:56PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:09:05 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > > getbuildlog(1) from devscripts downloads (almost, if you ignore a
> > > small header/footer) text-versions of build logs.
> > it is exactly that header and footer that I was reffering to when I wrote
> > “withouth HTML processing”.
>
> Ok. It doesn't really hurt IMO, but that's just me.
>
> > Would it be acceptable to serve the build logs as plain text files ? Would a
> > patch be welcome ?
>
> I looks rather easy to strip the HTML, e.g. with the one-line patch
> below. I leave it to you if you want to submit it against devscripts
> :)

That's unfortunately not enough, as some characters (at the very least
quotes and <,>) are replaced with html entities.

Mike


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110216085324.GB3718@glandium.org">http://lists.debian.org/20110216085324.GB3718@glandium.org