Make Unicode bugs release critical? (was: RFA: all my packages)
Adam Borowski wrote:
> Speaking of rxvt... shouldn't this clusterϫϫck become the only rxvt in
> Debian? Both rxvt and rxvt-beta, completely dead upstream for 10 and 8
> years respectively, besides having terrible support for terminal codes lack
> even such a tiny detail as UTF-8 support.
> I'd say there should be no place in Debian in 2011 for software that
> can't do UTF-8, especially if near-identical forks exist.
I'd replace "especially" with "only" in that sentence.
Kicking out good and unique software, only because of missing or
incomplete UTF-8 support, will surely lower Debian's quality more than
missing or broken UTF-8 support in very few packages. And it would
make those users (and devs) angry who need that software independently
of working UTF-8 support or not.
,'`. | Axel Beckert <firstname.lastname@example.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com
|All times are GMT. The time now is 05:40 AM.|
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.