Hi,
15/12 I released gcc-avr version 1:4.2.2-1, but acording to:

http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-avr

the s390 buildd has not yet tried to build it. What might be the problem?

Thanx.

--
Håkan Ardö

On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> Hi,
> 15/12 I released gcc-avr version 1:4.2.2-1, but acording to:

> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-avr

> the s390 buildd has not yet tried to build it. What might be the problem?

The s390 buildd maintainer presumes to mark all packages as 'Not-for-us' if
he doesn't feel like building them for the arch, without bothering to reach
a consensus first together with the maintainer, the ftp masters, or the
maintainers of the P-a-s overrides.

--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> Hi,
> 15/12 I released gcc-avr version 1:4.2.2-1, but acording to:
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-avr
>
> the s390 buildd has not yet tried to build it. What might be the problem?

http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=gcc-avr says "Not for us" so the
s390 buildd admins decided to not build the package. You should contact
s390@buildd.debian.org for this.


Cheers,
Michael


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 15/12 I released gcc-avr version 1:4.2.2-1, but acording to:
> >
> > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-avr
> >
> > the s390 buildd has not yet tried to build it. What might be the problem?
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=gcc-avr says "Not for us" so the
> s390 buildd admins decided to not build the package. You should contact
> s390@buildd.debian.org for this.
>

Good luck.

Michael, who has tried that for ages.

On 05/02/08 at 11:43 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 15/12 I released gcc-avr version 1:4.2.2-1, but acording to:
>
> > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-avr
>
> > the s390 buildd has not yet tried to build it. What might be the problem?
>
> The s390 buildd maintainer presumes to mark all packages as 'Not-for-us' if
> he doesn't feel like building them for the arch, without bothering to reach
> a consensus first together with the maintainer, the ftp masters, or the
> maintainers of the P-a-s overrides.

I think that the following patch would solve this problem in a nice and
easy way:

--- update_out.py.orig 2008-02-05 15:29:47.000000000 -0700
+++ update_out.py 2008-02-05 15:30:16.000000000 -0700
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@

# Configuration information

-expected_arches = 11
-allarches = [ 'i386', 'sparc', 'alpha', 'powerpc', 'arm', 'hppa', 'ia64', 'mips', 'mipsel', 's390', 'amd64' ]
+expected_arches = 10
+allarches = [ 'i386', 'sparc', 'alpha', 'powerpc', 'arm', 'hppa', 'ia64', 'mips', 'mipsel', 'amd64' ]

mindays = { "low" : 10, "medium" : 5, "high" : 2, "critical" : 0,
"emergency" : 0 }
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 11:35:30PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 05/02/08 at 11:43 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 15/12 I released gcc-avr version 1:4.2.2-1, but acording to:

> > > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-avr

> > > the s390 buildd has not yet tried to build it. What might be the problem?

> > The s390 buildd maintainer presumes to mark all packages as 'Not-for-us' if
> > he doesn't feel like building them for the arch, without bothering to reach
> > a consensus first together with the maintainer, the ftp masters, or the
> > maintainers of the P-a-s overrides.

> I think that the following patch would solve this problem in a nice and
> easy way:

Which is not the same thing as deciding that s390 is no longer a release
candidate, so if s390 is *not* dropped as a release candidate it would then
become the release team's problem to clean up the resulting delta in
testing...

--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org