Il giorno Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:37:26 +0100
"Adam D. Barratt" <firstname.lastname@example.org> ha scritto:
> > * 1 package has temporary dependency screwup
> What specifically does "temporary dependency screwup" mean?
gtkrsync requires some build-dependencies conflicting each other. I
didn't spend a lot of time on this specific issue, so I'm not able to
say where the problem is right now.
> > I have already informed upstream of my rebuild tests, and I hopefully
> > will be given instructions on how to properly fix FTBFSes, which I will
> > report as important bugs against affected packages. SCons 2.0 release
> > should happen in June, if RT does not mind, I intend to upload 2.0 to
> > unstable shortafter.
> I'm assuming that this is "just" a new upstream version? i.e. once the
> FTBFS packages are fixed and assuming no RC issues in scons itself
> appear, there'd be no need for any explicit action from the Release Team
> and SCons 2.0 would simply transition to testing once its 10 days were
Exactly, given that several packages build-depend on SCons, and there
could be some hidden aspects I'm not aware of, informing RT in advance
could avoid additional headache to team members
: :' : Luca Falavigna <email@example.com>