Le vendredi 20 novembre 2009 * 17:41 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
> /usr/X11R6 is gone but code trying to use it lives on.
>
> Today I noticed gnome-settings-daemon doing this every 2 seconds for an unknown
> reason that I have not yet tracked down:
>
> inotify_add_watch(20, "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11", IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|I N_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_M OVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT|IN_ONLYDIR) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
It’s probably the fontconfig monitor, checking
whether /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts appears, since this directory is
referenced in fonts.conf.
Of course it’s not expected to do that every 2 seconds, it should only
do it upon startup.
--
.'`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
`- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
11-20-2009, 10:49 PM
Julien Cristau
leftover /usr/X11R6 references
Package: libxcursor1
Version: 1:1.1.9-1
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 17:41:32 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> /usr/X11R6 is gone but code trying to use it lives on.
>
[...]
> There are probably more references total than can be sensibly removed,
> but perhaps it would be worth adding some targeted lintian checks to warn about
> uses in places, like libraries, where it probably indicates the library is
> doing unnecessary work of including the directory in a search path?
Is this really worth of diversion from upstream?
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
11-21-2009, 08:10 AM
Mikhail Gusarov
leftover /usr/X11R6 references
Twas brillig at 03:00:27 21.11.2009 UTC+01 when nijel@debian.org did gyre and gimble:
>> There are probably more references total than can be sensibly removed,
>> but perhaps it would be worth adding some targeted lintian checks to warn about
>> uses in places, like libraries, where it probably indicates the library is
>> doing unnecessary work of including the directory in a search path?
MČ> Is this really worth of diversion from upstream?
It worth reporting to upstream and sending patches.
--
http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/
11-21-2009, 08:25 AM
Michal Čihař
leftover /usr/X11R6 references
Hi
Dne Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:10:54 +0600
Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net> napsal(a):
>
> Twas brillig at 03:00:27 21.11.2009 UTC+01 when nijel@debian.org did gyre and gimble:
>
> >> There are probably more references total than can be sensibly removed,
> >> but perhaps it would be worth adding some targeted lintian checks to warn about
> >> uses in places, like libraries, where it probably indicates the library is
> >> doing unnecessary work of including the directory in a search path?
>
> MČ> Is this really worth of diversion from upstream?
>
> It worth reporting to upstream and sending patches.
Is really /usr/X11R6 deprecated everywhere? I'm afraid it's just FHS.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
11-21-2009, 08:32 AM
"George Danchev"
leftover /usr/X11R6 references
Quoting "Michal Čihař" <nijel@debian.org>:
Hi
Dne Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:10:54 +0600
Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net> napsal(a):
Twas brillig at 03:00:27 21.11.2009 UTC+01 when nijel@debian.org
did gyre and gimble:
>> There are probably more references total than can be sensibly removed,
>> but perhaps it would be worth adding some targeted lintian
checks to warn about
>> uses in places, like libraries, where it probably indicates the
library is
>> doing unnecessary work of including the directory in a search path?
MČ> Is this really worth of diversion from upstream?
It worth reporting to upstream and sending patches.
Is really /usr/X11R6 deprecated everywhere? I'm afraid it's just FHS.
it is FHS, but it is optional.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
leftover /usr/X11R6 references
