mdadm+udev roadmap (was: RFH: mdadm packaging)
also sprach Dustin Kirkland <email@example.com> [2009.03.01.1951 +0100]:
> Most of the Ubuntu diff is present due to our use of udev for device bringup.
> Is there roadmap for udev in Debian?
I think we are trying to minimise the diff with upstream, but you
probably want to know about the mdadm+udev roadmap.
I'd like to work with upstream to improve the whole situation about
md devices. Right now, we have to create a device to be able to
issue ioctl()s to configure the array. I'd prefer instead if mdadm
could write to /sys (or through another means), bring up devices,
which then appear to udev just like any other block device.
Until that's in place, I am happy to consider Ubuntu's approach, if
it is stable enough. I think we have standardised/enforced udev by
now so that we could go down that road.
.'`. martin f. krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"never attribute to malice what can be
adequately explained by incompetence."
-- mark twain
|All times are GMT. The time now is 11:11 PM.|
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.