CC Attribution ShareALike (CC-by-sa) 3.0
Hi everyone,
it is quite hard to get definitive answer on the above license. Interestingly the Debian wiki says that In contrast to the CC-SA 2.0 license, version 3.0 is considered to be compatible to the DFSG. and there are many discussions about the CC-BY-SA but no definitive answer. Does anyone know anything about that license? Best wishes Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Vienna University of Technology Debian Developer <preining@debian.org> Debian TeX Group gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BLEAN Scientific measure of luminosity : 1 glimmer = 100,000 bleans. Usherettes' torches are designed to produce between 2.5 and 4 bleans, enabling them to assist you in falling downstairs, treading on people or putting your hand into a Neapolitan tub when reaching for change. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
CC Attribution ShareALike (CC-by-sa) 3.0
Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> (27/02/2009):
> it is quite hard to get definitive answer on the above license. > Interestingly the Debian wiki says that > In contrast to the CC-SA 2.0 license, version 3.0 is considered > to be compatible to the DFSG. > and there are many discussions about the CC-BY-SA but no definitive > answer. ISTR (some of) -legal@ saying not DFSG-compliant, ftpmasters saying yes, but that's only my (bad) memory. > Does anyone know anything about that license? Looking at the pool: | kibi@gluck:/org/lintian.debian.org/laboratory/source$ grep -i cc-by-sa */debfiles/copyright | botan/debfiles/copyright:License: CC-BY-SA-2.5 | botan-devel/debfiles/copyright:License: CC-BY-SA-2.5 | freedink-data/debfiles/copyright: License: CC-BY-SA 3.0 Unported | freedink-data/debfiles/copyright: License: GPLv3+ | Art Libre | CC-BY-SA | freedink-data/debfiles/copyright: License: GPLv3+ | Art Libre | CC-BY-SA | freedink-data/debfiles/copyright: License: GPLv3+ | Art Libre | CC-BY-SA | freedink-data/debfiles/copyright: License: CC-BY-SA | gnuit/debfiles/copyright: "CC-BY-SA" means the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 | gnuit/debfiles/copyright: under CC-BY-SA on the same site at any time before August 1, 2009, | grub2-splashimages/debfiles/copyright: Aesculus_hippocastanum_fruit.tga Andrew Dunn [[:en:User:Solipsist]] CC-BY-SA-2.0 | grub2-splashimages/debfiles/copyright: Flower_jtca001.tga Sam Oth [[:c:User:World Trekker]] CC-BY-SA-2.5 | grub2-splashimages/debfiles/copyright: Plasma-lamp.tga Luc Viatour [[:c:User:Lviatour]] GNU FDL >= 1.2 or CC-BY-SA 2.5, 2.0, and 1.0 | grub2-splashimages/debfiles/copyright: Sparkler.tga Gabriel Pollard <gabriel.pollard@wikinewsie.org> CC-BY-SA 2.5 | grub2-splashimages/debfiles/copyright:License (CC-BY-SA 2.5): | grub2-splashimages/debfiles/copyright:License (CC-BY-SA 2.0): | libtasn1-3/debfiles/copyright: “CC-BY-SA” means the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 license | libtasn1-3/debfiles/copyright: under CC-BY-SA on the same site at any time before August 1, 2009, provided | oxine/debfiles/copyright:License: CC-BY-SA-2 | splint/debfiles/copyright: > (under which the splint software itself is licensed) or CC-BY-SA 3.0 | splint/debfiles/copyright: I hereby release that code under CC-BY-SA 3.0. | splint/debfiles/copyright: post using CC-BY-SA 3.0. He on behalf of Duolog is okay with this, as am | splint/debfiles/copyright: Please use the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license to license this post. | splint/debfiles/copyright: which the splint software itself is licensed) or CC-BY-SA 3.0 (under | terminator/debfiles/copyright: Cory Kontros - Produced our current icon under the CC-by-SA licence | warzone2100/debfiles/copyright:License: CC-BY-SA-3.0 | warzone2100/debfiles/copyright:License: CC-BY-SA-3.0 | wound-up/debfiles/copyright:> music licenced under the CC-by v2.0 (the game itself is CC-by-sa v3.0). freedink-data having seen a single upload, there's no doubts its current license has been approved by ftpmasters, and that it hasn't been altered afterwards. Mraw, KiBi. |
CC Attribution ShareALike (CC-by-sa) 3.0
Hi,
On Freitag, 27. Februar 2009, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > ISTR (some of) -legal@ saying not DFSG-compliant, some people on -legal will always disagree, what counts more is the (rough) consenus... > ftpmasters saying yes, and ftpmaster, obviously :) > Looking at the pool: wow, I'm surprised to see 2.0 and 2.5 licences there. AFAIU (and I've read those licences...) and AFAIK, cc-by-sa 3.0 is fine for main, previous versions not. So I guess some bugs are in order to be filed... regards, Holger |
CC Attribution ShareALike (CC-by-sa) 3.0
Le vendredi 27 fvrier 2009 15:46 +0100, Holger Levsen a crit :
> wow, I'm surprised to see 2.0 and 2.5 licences there. AFAIU (and I've read > those licences...) and AFAIK, cc-by-sa 3.0 is fine for main, previous > versions not. So I guess some bugs are in order to be filed... Anyway, versions 2.0 and 2.5 allow relicensing to 3.0, so if we accept 3.0, the older versions are a non-issue. -- .'`. Debian 5.0 "Lenny" has been released! : :' : `. `' Last night, Darth Vader came down from planet Vulcan and told `- me that if you don't install Lenny, he'd melt your brain. |
CC Attribution ShareALike (CC-by-sa) 3.0
On Freitag, 27. Februar 2009, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Anyway, versions 2.0 and 2.5 allow relicensing to 3.0 By anyone? |
CC Attribution ShareALike (CC-by-sa) 3.0
Le vendredi 27 fvrier 2009 16:02 +0100, Holger Levsen a crit :
> On Freitag, 27. Februar 2009, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Anyway, versions 2.0 and 2.5 allow relicensing to 3.0 > > By anyone? 4b : You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this License, a later version of this License with the same License Elements as this License, or a Creative Commons iCommons license that contains the same License Elements as this License (e.g. Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Japan). Since a Debian package is clearly a derivative work, we can distribute Debian packages of CC-BY-SA 2.0 software under CC-BY-SA 3.0. -- .'`. Debian 5.0 "Lenny" has been released! : :' : `. `' Last night, Darth Vader came down from planet Vulcan and told `- me that if you don't install Lenny, he'd melt your brain. |
CC Attribution ShareALike (CC-by-sa) 3.0
Hi there!
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:08:35 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> (27/02/2009): >> Does anyone know anything about that license? > > Looking at the pool: > | kibi@gluck:/org/lintian.debian.org/laboratory/source$ grep -i cc-by-sa */debfiles/copyright This does not match everything, since some packages can list the full license name only, e.g. Hunchentoot: The logo is Copyright 2007-2008 Uwe von Loh <uvl@htg1.de> and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/): Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca |
CC Attribution ShareALike (CC-by-sa) 3.0
Luca Capello <luca@pca.it> (28/02/2009):
> This does not match everything, since some packages can list the full > license name only, e.g. Hunchentoot: […] Never said it would. The idea was just to point to an obvious example showing ftpmasters' acceptance of such a package. Mraw, KiBi. |
CC Attribution ShareALike (CC-by-sa) 3.0
Holger Levsen <holger <at> layer-acht.org> writes:
> On Freitag, 27. Februar 2009, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > ISTR (some of) -legal@ saying not DFSG-compliant, > > some people on -legal will always disagree, what counts more is the (rough) > consenus... Sure, but I thought we had an explicit consensus on discrimination against fields of endeavour, which is seen in CC-By 3.0 4.a about "effective technological measures". Happily, that's only a lawyerbomb (in that no-one, even within CC, seemed to agree what it means for debian - is offering source code enough to satisfy it?) and not a current live problem. Beware some of the "ported" CCs which include the trademark notice by mistake and produced a licence which failed to follow DFSG - and some were incompatible with other CC licences. Hope that helps, -- MJ Ray My Opinion Only, see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:19 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.