GTK+ 1.2 has been deprecated upstream for 6 years. There is no security
support for it, and no new applications using it have been out for quite
a long time as well.
I think it is more than time to remove it from the archive. Of course,
this can only be done after we have dealt with the reverse dependencies.
For them, there are not many solutions:
* Look for alternatives using GTK+ 2.x. For most utilities and
games, they already exist, whether already in the archive or
somewhere else ready to be packaged.
* Port to GTK+ 2.x. Depending on the application, this can be a
trivial or very large task, and it requires a bit of motivation.
* Simply drop the application from the archive.
Here is a first list of packages that could either be removed right now
because they seem to have replacements, or updated with little work. If
there are no objections, I think we should ask for removal of all of
those which don’t have a GTK+ 2 version.
Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) <geiger@debian.org>
shaketracker
=> we have other sequencers in the archive
swami
=> upstream is currently porting it to GTK+ 2
Marc Dequènes (Duck) <Duck@DuckCorp.org>
worlded
=> no upstream news for 4 years, we have better such games in the
archive
Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
gcrontab
=> gnome-schedule
Stephen M Moraco <stephen@debian.org>
karpski
=> wireshark
Ryan Murray <rmurray@debian.org>
gdk-pixbuf
Francesco Namuri <francesco@namuri.it>
lopster
=> did you know that Napster was shut down?
Kari Pahula <kaol@debian.org>
crossfire-client
=> just need to disable the GTK+ 1.2 build
Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
zangband
=> yay, a rogue game
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <jfs@computer.org>
cheops
=> I don’t think we have a similar tool, but all the functionality
should be covered by combining 2 or 3 of them.
i2e
=> We have more generic and modern dictionary tools
Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
gcvs
=> At least the toolkit is assorted to the VCS. Many IDEs or editors
still have a CVS plugin anyway.
gps
=> gnome-system-monitor and many others
Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
libgtkimreg
paul
=> Yay, an imaging library and an image viewer
Marcela Tiznado <mlt@debian.org>
gtkgo
=> quarry
Guido Trotter <ultrotter@debian.org>
directory-administrator
=> gq + several web-based such frontends
Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>
soundtracker
=> there are a few other trackers, especially ardour, although none of
them uses the MOD/XM format
Michael Vogt <mvo@debian.org>
corewars
=> maybe we should package pmars instead?
Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
putty
=> hotwire, a plain terminal…
Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org>
mountapp
=> yay, a dockapp
Rafal Zawadzki <bluszcz@jabberpl.org>
wmshutdown
=> yay, a dockapp
For the following packages, I didn’t find any trivial solution, so this
needs further investigation.
Ryan Schultz <schultz.ryan@gmail.com>
psemu-input-padjoy
psemu-sound-peops
psemu-video-x11
Paul Slootman <paul@debian.org>
linpopup
Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
python-visual
Riccardo Stagni <unriccio@email.it>
gcx
Lucas Wall <lwall@debian.org>
pilrc
Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>
lazarus (U)
python-visual (U)
Cheers,
--
.'`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
`- our own. Resistance is futile.
12-05-2008, 05:19 PM
James Vega
Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 07:06:26PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Jon Bernard <jbernard@debian.org>
> e16menuedit
> => we don’t ship E16 anymore
packages.debian.org says otherwise.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <jamessan@debian.org>
12-05-2008, 05:27 PM
Barry deFreese
Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2
Josselin Mouette wrote:
<snip>
Debian Games Team <pkg-games-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
lmemory
=> gcompris ?
=> QA-maintained packages should be removed as soon as they don’t have
remaining rdeps
I will look at this as well since I'm on an RM:/proposed RM kick. I
assume this is more of a Lenny+1 goal?
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
12-05-2008, 07:11 PM
Barry deFreese
Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2
Barry deFreese wrote:
OK, I have looked at several of these and man what a mess.
<snip>
Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
gnome-libs
Orphaned but obviously tons of r(b)depends.
gtkfontsel
Orphaned but a fairly significant popcon. I can't find new upstream
source. Could probably be ported or RM:d.
gtkglarea
Orphaned and I can't find any upstream source yet but again lots of
r(b)depends.
imlib
Orphaned and LOTS of r(b)depends.
netdude
ITA'd. There is a new upstream available. I've pinged the ITAer to see
if the new upstream is GTK 2.0.
sqlrelay
Some of the binaries have decent popcons. We could probably either port
sqlrelay-config-gtk or just remove that binary for now.
stegdetect
RM: filed.
Is this really feasible? How many people are going to work on dead
packages? Or if we RM: the lot of them, how many users are we pissing off?
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
12-05-2008, 08:01 PM
Scott Kitterman
Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2
On Friday 05 December 2008 13:06, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Paul Mangan <claws@thewildbeast.co.uk>
> * *sylpheed-gtk1 (U)
...
>
> Ricardo Mones <mones@debian.org>
> * *sylpheed-gtk1
> *=> sylpheed-claws
sylpheed-gtk1 should be replaced by sylpheed. sylpheed-claws (now claws-mail)
is a fork.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
12-05-2008, 08:41 PM
Morten Kjeldgaard
Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2
On 05/12/2008, at 21.11, Barry deFreese wrote:
Is this really feasible? How many people are going to work on dead
packages? Or if we RM: the lot of them, how many users are we
pissing off?
There are several useful science programs that still make use of GTK+
1.2, one is a very useful chemistry program, GAMGI, which is in the
new queue and on its way into unstable. The other is coot, a
widespread application for macromolecular crystallography.
Please don't remove GTK+ 1.2. There are still upstream authors,
especially in science who use GTK+ 1.2 and who don't bother revising
their programs from the wisdom: if it ain't broke don't fix it.
Cheers,
Morten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
My intention is to request removal of gtimer when there's a consensus that
GTK+ 1.2 is going away. The package has been RFA for years without a
nibble, I haven't used it personally in about five years, and I'm only
still maintaining it because I know a few people use it and it hasn't
required much effort to keep it mostly up to snuff. But the resources to
port it to a new version of GTK just aren't there, and it's dead upstream.
If it's now time to get rid of GTK+ 1.2, I can file a removal request for
it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
12-05-2008, 09:11 PM
Luk Claes
Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> writes:
>
>> Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
>> gtimer
>> => hamster-applet, gnotime
>
> My intention is to request removal of gtimer when there's a consensus that
> GTK+ 1.2 is going away. The package has been RFA for years without a
> nibble, I haven't used it personally in about five years, and I'm only
> still maintaining it because I know a few people use it and it hasn't
> required much effort to keep it mostly up to snuff. But the resources to
> port it to a new version of GTK just aren't there, and it's dead upstream.
>
> If it's now time to get rid of GTK+ 1.2, I can file a removal request for
> it.
I think there is a consensus to get rid of GTK+ 1.2, but we didn't
manage to do it for Lenny, although we made some progress. Personally I
would like to get rid of it before Squeeze preferably with ported
applications or alternatives.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
12-05-2008, 09:49 PM
Mark Brown
Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 07:06:26PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@debian.org>
> powertweak
> => Is that still relevant with modern power management policies?
It's nothing to do with power management. I'd rather let it stay until
lenny is released, though if it were the only thing keeping GTK 1.2 in
it should go.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
12-05-2008, 10:09 PM
Michael Banck
Packages still depending on GTK+ 1.2
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 10:41:52PM +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
>
> On 05/12/2008, at 21.11, Barry deFreese wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Is this really feasible? How many people are going to work on dead
>> packages? Or if we RM: the lot of them, how many users are we pissing
>> off?
>
> There are several useful science programs that still make use of GTK+
> 1.2, one is a very useful chemistry program, GAMGI, which is in the new
> queue and on its way into unstable.
AFAICT, gamgi is using GTK-2.0.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org