FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Debian > Debian Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 11-16-2008, 01:45 PM
Leo 'costela' Antunes
 
Default RFH: who should get this bug?

Hey,

I have no idea which package should get this minor bug[0] about some
characters covering the underscore that marks an activation key. My best
guess would be either libpango or libgtk2.0, but I'm at a loss here.
Opinions?

Cheers

[0] http://bugs.debian.org/501864

--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
 
Old 11-16-2008, 03:22 PM
Josselin Mouette
 
Default RFH: who should get this bug?

Le dimanche 16 novembre 2008 Ă* 15:45 +0100, Leo 'costela' Antunes a
Ă©crit :
> I have no idea which package should get this minor bug[0] about some
> characters covering the underscore that marks an activation key. My best
> guess would be either libpango or libgtk2.0, but I'm at a loss here.
> Opinions?

> [0] http://bugs.debian.org/501864

That would be libgtk2.0-0, but I can’t reproduce that. The underscore is
displayed further down over the g here (both GTK+ 2.12 and 2.14).

Cheers,
--
.'`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
`- our own. Resistance is futile.
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:57 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org