Encouraging CRUX community efforts to support CRUX developers.
Hi Danny and list,
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Danny Rawlins <monster.romster@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/04/12 21:07, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: [---snip---] >> If some ports are behind the latest versions, I would imagine that's >> because CRUX is lacking manpower. On the other hand, I understand that >> CRUX can't accept any random user as a developer. Most of the time, >> I've been updating ports by myself, on my machines, but I think it's >> rather sad that 1. it can't benefit the whole community 2. it's a >> duplicate effort as sooner or later, the official maintainer will >> update those ports. I've been posting few patches on IRC or sometimes >> sent them to maintainers by email but that is not always efficient >> because if you're too busy to update your ports, you're most likely >> too busy to review others' patches too. So I've been thinking about >> the following: >> >> What would you think about the creation of a community-patches-queue >> git repo accessible by, well, CRUX community. This is how it could >> work: >> >> 1. User U has updated port P on his machine, he would then commit a >> diff patch to community-patches-queue (we could also make a ports repo >> out of it and encourage people to use and test those ports but that's >> another story) >> 2. One (or more?) CRUX developer, available at that time, would >> volunteer to review and sign-off the patch. >> 3. Signed-off patches are sent to the official maintainer (or >> committed to community-patches-acked) so he could review and apply >> them or just apply them with peace of mind if he's too busy to review >> them fully (or even let other devs apply them?) >> > > I have done something smiler recently I forked the xorg repository and > updated nearly everything except a couple of ports that would break > things, if I post the site here it'll get this email spam filtered, it's > been on jaegers irc log a few times. I've thought of doing the same for > opt and perhaps contrib, but I would only be bumping stuff that I would > be confident to do so. > > I am in opt so I guess I am a dev now, I would welcome some system > system for more community involvement. Thanks for your informative reply. The main difference is this would be open to random users (i.e. trust level of zero) - as opposed to you being a CRUX developer - hence the sign-off process proposal. I've created a repo and slowly started to add some patches. Anyone willing to join, please let me know your github username or repo to pull from. https://github.com/horrorStruck/community-patches-queue or git clone git://github.com/horrorStruck/community-patches-queue.git what's in there so far (not much): opt/alsa-lib-1.0.24.1-1.0.25.patch | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ opt/alsa-oss-1.0.17-1.0.25.patch | 26 ++++++++++++ opt/alsa-utils-1.0.24.1-1.0.25.patch | 27 ++++++++++++ opt/gtk-2.24.8-2.24.10.patch | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ opt/pango-1.26.2-1.28.4.patch | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ opt/syslinux-4.04-4.05.patch | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ opt/wireshark-1.6.4-1.6.6.patch | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++ Lastly, if you think this is just wasting bandwidth and spamming your inbox, don't hesitate to let me know. Cheers, -- Emmanuel _______________________________________________ CRUX mailing list CRUX@lists.crux.nu http://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:27 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.