Handbook: a question and a typo fix
Hoi community,
I'm new to crux but I'm already enjoying it. You surely will hear more from me soon. :-) While reading the handbook I came across those this: 3.2. Installing From CD-ROM: > * Go to /usr/src/linux-2.6.35.x, configure and compile a new kernel. > > $ cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.35.x > $ make menuconfig > $ make all > $ make modules_install > $ cp arch/x86/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz > $ cp System.map /boot What's the reason for not using `make install'? 5.2.5. Enabling the 'contrib' collection > To let prt-get know that you want it to use the contrib tree to, edit There is an `o' missing: ... contrib tree too, edit ... meillo _______________________________________________ CRUX mailing list CRUX@lists.crux.nu http://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux |
Handbook: a question and a typo fix
* markus schnalke (meillo@marmaro.de) wrote:
> Hoi community, > > I'm new to crux but I'm already enjoying it. You surely will hear more > from me soon. :-) Welcome! > What's the reason for not using `make install'? Because it's too general I'd say. > There is an `o' missing: ... contrib tree too, edit ... I fixed that, thanks. Regards, Thomas -- .. _______________________________________________ CRUX mailing list CRUX@lists.crux.nu http://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux |
Handbook: a question and a typo fix
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Thomas Penteker <tek@serverop.de> wrote:
>> What's the reason for not using `make install'? > > Because it's too general I'd say. FYI, I use "make install" myself and have done so for many years now as I find it just takes an extra few steps away that I don't have to do. (ie: manually copy, etc). I don't think it really matter tbh. cheers James -- -- James Mills -- -- "Problems are solved by method" _______________________________________________ CRUX mailing list CRUX@lists.crux.nu http://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux |
Handbook: a question and a typo fix
[2011-04-14 09:18] James Mills <prologic@shortcircuit.net.au>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Thomas Penteker <tek@serverop.de> wrote: > >> What's the reason for not using `make install'? > > > > Because it's too general I'd say. > > FYI, I use "make install" myself and have done so for many years now > as I find it just takes an extra few steps away that I don't have to do. > (ie: manually copy, etc). > > I don't think it really matter tbh. Thanks for your explanations. IMO `make install' is a convenient and well-known idiom, thus I wondered why it wasn't used. But running the necessary commands directly is fine too. Maybe a comment on this in the handbook would be nice. meillo _______________________________________________ CRUX mailing list CRUX@lists.crux.nu http://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux |
Handbook: a question and a typo fix
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:47:09PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
> Hoi community, Hello Markus, > > I'm new to crux but I'm already enjoying it. You surely will hear more > from me soon. :-) welcome :-) > > > While reading the handbook I came across those this: > > > 3.2. Installing From CD-ROM: > > > * Go to /usr/src/linux-2.6.35.x, configure and compile a new kernel. > > > > $ cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.35.x > > $ make menuconfig > > $ make all > > $ make modules_install > > $ cp arch/x86/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz > > $ cp System.map /boot > > What's the reason for not using `make install'? because it runs lilo after installing the kernel and System.map, which is something not everybody wants. Excerpt from 'make help': install - Install kernel using (your) ~/bin/installkernel or (distribution) /sbin/installkernel or install to $(INSTALL_PATH) and run lilo HTH and best regards Juergen -- Juergen Daubert | mailto:jue@jue.li Korb, Germany | http://jue.li/crux _______________________________________________ CRUX mailing list CRUX@lists.crux.nu http://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:39 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.