From: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: What is the difference among CFI version 1, 3 and 4?
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:34:10 +0100

> On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 12:18 +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
>> However, I don't know what was added from version 1 to 3, and from
>> version 3 and 4. Could anyone suggest me that or tell me documentation
>> useful to recognize the difference in addition to the original Dwarf
>> specifications?
>
> http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/dwarfext.html
> http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/ehframechpt.html
>
> Are useful since they describe differences and additions
> between .debug_frame (as defined by dwarf2) and .eh_frame (which mostly
> follows dwarf3 conventions).
>

That's very helpful. The way they are described is just what I'm
looking for. Thanks!

Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke

--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility

On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 12:18 +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> However, I don't know what was added from version 1 to 3, and from
> version 3 and 4. Could anyone suggest me that or tell me documentation
> useful to recognize the difference in addition to the original Dwarf
> specifications?

http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/dwarfext.html
http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/ehframechpt.html

Are useful since they describe differences and additions
between .debug_frame (as defined by dwarf2) and .eh_frame (which mostly
follows dwarf3 conventions).

Cheers,

Mark

--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility