FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Cluster Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 03-14-2011, 05:49 PM
Andrew Beekhof
 
Default new resource agents repository commit policy

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> It's time to figure out how to maintain the new Resource Agents
> repository. Fabio and I already discussed this a bit in IRC.
> There are two options:
>
> a) everybody gets an account at github.com and commit rights,
> * where everybody is all people who had commit rights to
> * linux-ha.org and rgmanager agents repositories.
>
> b) several maintainers have commit rights and everybody else
> * sends patches to a ML; then one of the maintainers does a
> * review and commits the patch (or pulls it from the author's
> * repository).

I suspect you want b) with maybe 6 people for redundancy.
The pull request workflow should be well suited to a project like this
and impose minimal overhead.

The ability to comment on patches in-line before merging them should
be pretty handy.


You're also welcome to put a copy at http://www.clusterlabs.org/git/
Its pretty easy to keep the two repos in sync, for example I have this
in .git/config for matahari:

[remote "origin"]
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
url = git@github.com:matahari/matahari.git
pushurl = git@github.com:matahari/matahari.git
pushurl = ssh://beekhof@git.fedorahosted.org/git/matahari.git

"git push" then sends to both locations

>
> Option a) incurs a bit less overhead and that's how our old
> repositories worked. Option b) gives, at least nominally, more
> control to the select group of maintainers, but also places even
> more burden on them.
>
> We are open for either of these.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Fabio and Dejan
> __________________________________________________ _____
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
 
Old 03-28-2011, 03:28 PM
Dejan Muhamedagic
 
Default new resource agents repository commit policy

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:20:48AM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2011-03-14T19:49:29, Andrew Beekhof <andrew@beekhof.net> wrote:
>
> > I suspect you want b) with maybe 6 people for redundancy.
> > The pull request workflow should be well suited to a project like this
> > and impose minimal overhead.
>
> I prefer b as well, since it adds another review step. (Should we use
> the github.com code review tools?)

OK. It seems like nobody's that much interesting in this, so we
can just as well go with option b).

Fabio, I'd like to get the commit access rights. Florian Haas and
Lars Ellenberg have also been frequently reviewing user
contributions, so they should get commit rights too. I understand
that Florian already has that. Lars is about to create a
github.com account and he'll send you later his account name.

> Oh, and we can use the ha-wg-technical mailing list for cross-project
> coordination ;-)

Yes, but the list is very new and some people who may be affected
are perhaps not all subscribed.

Cheers,

Dejan

> Regards,
> Lars
>
> --
> Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
> "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
>
> __________________________________________________ _____
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 07:47 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org