GFS2 -nmw tree
Hi,
I've rebased this today. Also, I've dropped out the (rather controversial) tracepoints moving patch. It may well still make it into the next merge window, but I don't want it to hold up the rest of the tree so it seemed sensible to separate it for the time being. I hope that agreement will be reached as to its fate shortly and by dropping it for the time being I have given an extra incentive to one of the parties to resolve the issue. Steve. |
GFS2 -nmw tree
Hi,
Since Linus pulled the patch from the -fixes tree, I've rebased the -nmw tree on top of his latest tree again, Steve. |
GFS2 -nmw tree
Hi,
I pushed the patch set tidying up the link counts and merging inode.c and ops_inode.c this morning. However, since I checked the tree out again, I spotted that git has done a funny with the resulting files. It looks like if you do: git rm a git mv b a git commit -a Then you land up with _both_ of a and b missing. The patch displayed ok in the web interface, and appeared to show the right outcome, but the "b" (in this case fs/gfs2/inode.c) was missing from the resulting tree. So I've just done a quick update splitting the final patch in the series into two, which has fixed the problem. Sorry about that, if it has caused any confusion. It is exactly the same changes, but now split over two patches, Steve. |
GFS2 -nmw tree
Hi,
Linus has pulled the GFS2 -nmw git tree, so it is now empty again. I'll accumulate patches here as usual to be added to the tree once -rc1 has appeared, Steve. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 03:46 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.