A couple of 32-bit packages got no update in 6.3/x86_64
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Michael Lampe
> <email@example.com> wrote:
>> * hivex
>> * hivex-devel
>> * librdmac
>> * librdmac-devel
>> * sanlock-libs
>> * sanlock-devel
See http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0996.html for more info about
sanlock . Looks like the do not have sanlock i386 in x86_64 tree anymore.
>> and maybe others.
>> Is this on purpose (I don't know if upstream has removed or updated the
>> 32-bit rpms, but the old ones are still in C6.3/x86_64), or is it just
>> the usual sloppyness (I've been told here on previous occasions the
>> biarch is a pain in the ass to maintain, nobody cares anyway, it's not
>> 'plain', and no sensible man should be using it).
> CentOS mailing list
CentOS mailing list