On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 21:05 +0100, Michael Lampe wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> > I totally lost you.
> No problem. Play the game of chess like your namesake did so well.
> > Please provide specifics, what package, is it in rpm
> > or not, details please, so we do not chase out own tails.
> Gimme a trick: How to unregister an implicit but formally unavailable
> runtime dependency in a spec file?
> It's there at build time and therfore automatically used. Package builds
> fine. But it can only be installed by force, because the implicit
> dependency is explicitly recorded in the RPM. I want to get rid of that,
> because fixing Intel's stuff is not an option.
Would it be be possible to create a dummy rom that requires the
intel-rpm but does provide the dependency?
CentOS mailing list