binding additional IP addresses to centos6 on one interface
I know this was discussed before, and I have seen a million ways of
doing this via online docs. I have a quick question that hopefully the community can help me out with I am trying to add a block of 10 IP addresses. Rather then create 10 different alias files, I want to use the RANGE file. Docs say to use the following format: IPADDR_START=x.x.x.x IPADDR_END=x.x.x.x CLONENUM_START=0 If the IP's that are given to you are on a completely seperate gateway / netmask, how would you enter it into this file? Is it necessary? Please advise. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
binding additional IP addresses to centos6 on one interface
Jonathan Vomacka writes:
> Reindl, > > A block of 10 IPV4 is not a lot, and they will all eventually be used. > My question is, my server IP is 66.80.x.x and my additional IPS are in > the 50.7.x.x range using a netmask of 255.255.255.248. > > Can the netmask be written in the range file like it is in the ifcfg-eth0:0? Reindl, Please do not top post. 255.255.255.248 gives you a total of 8 IPs, not 10, of which usually you loose 3 for the network, broadcast and gw addresses. You can assign those 5 in a range file without problems, you can also specify the netmask like in a "normal" cfg file. It shouldn't be needed to specify other settings. Where I work we'd route the additional subnet through the IP you already have on the server, thus allowing you to allocate _all_ 8 IPs as a range on the loopback interface with a /32 netmask. See if your ISP can do this for you. -- Nux! www.nux.ro _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 06:05 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.