Odd ethernet interface
Vreme: 11/05/2011 01:10 AM, Mufit Eribol piše:
> Hello, > > I have a CentOS 6 VM on a CentOS 6 host. This VM has two ethernet > interfaces, eth0 and eth1. It was working nice. All of a sudden eth1 > stopped working as expected. Kernel started to give the message below: > > kernel: udev: renamed network interface eth2 to eth2-eth1 > > There is no any eth2 or eth2-eth1 in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/. I > really don't know where it is coming from. Your eth1 is being automaticaly renamed to eth2-eth1 for some reason. Have you changed anything in config(s) connected to eth1? Are name and device name in ifcfg-ethX consistent? Have you reshufled your configs and left loose end somewhere? Do you maybe have NetworkManager still active? -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd ethernet interface
On 11/04/11 5:32 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Do you maybe have NetworkManager still active? is there any documentation on how to work with NetworkManager in shell-only mode? the RHEL manuals I looked at all seemed to assume you're running a GUI console, which I never do on my servers. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd ethernet interface
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:42:03 -0700
John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote: > is there any documentation on how to work with NetworkManager in > shell-only mode? the RHEL manuals I looked at all seemed to assume > you're running a GUI console, which I never do on my servers. I'd recommend the same treatment for network manager as we used for sendmail all those years back: # yum -y remove NetworkManager And then configure your network the old, verified, stable and trusted way, by editing the ifcfg files. The whole idea of having something running on a *server* that can change your networks settings for whatever reason is horribly wrong. To answer your question, there exist something called nm-cli, but I found it to be not of much use. -- Jure Pečar http://jure.pecar.org http://f5j.eu _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd ethernet interface
On 11/04/11 6:29 PM, Jure Pečar wrote:
> I'd recommend the same treatment for network manager as we used for sendmail > all those years back: > # yum -y remove NetworkManager > > And then configure your network the old, verified, stable and trusted way, > by editing the ifcfg files. The whole idea of having something running on a > *server* that can change your networks settings for whatever reason is > horribly wrong. great. how do I do dhcp (client) without NetworkManager ? Most all my lab servers are configured via DHCP reservations. and where IS the docs on what-all goes in ifcfg-eth0 or whatever now days? again, the RHEL6 manuals seem to skip over these details. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd ethernet interface
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/04/11 6:29 PM, Jure Pečar wrote: >> I'd recommend the same treatment for network manager as we used for sendmail >> all those years back: >> # yum -y remove NetworkManager >> >> And then configure your network the old, verified, stable and trusted way, >> by editing the ifcfg files. The whole idea of having something running on a >> *server* that can change your networks settings for whatever reason is >> horribly wrong. > > great. how do I do dhcp (client) without NetworkManager ? Most all my > lab servers are configured via DHCP reservations. > > and where IS the docs on what-all goes in ifcfg-eth0 or whatever now > days? again, the RHEL6 manuals seem to skip over these details. > BOOTPROTO=dhcp it's documented same as in previous versions in /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd ethernet interface
On 05.11.2011 02:32, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 11/05/2011 01:10 AM, Mufit Eribol piše: >> Hello, >> >> I have a CentOS 6 VM on a CentOS 6 host. This VM has two ethernet >> interfaces, eth0 and eth1. It was working nice. All of a sudden eth1 >> stopped working as expected. Kernel started to give the message below: >> >> kernel: udev: renamed network interface eth2 to eth2-eth1 >> >> There is no any eth2 or eth2-eth1 in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/. I >> really don't know where it is coming from. > Your eth1 is being automaticaly renamed to eth2-eth1 for some reason. > Have you changed anything in config(s) connected to eth1? > > Are name and device name in ifcfg-ethX consistent? Have you reshufled > your configs and left loose end somewhere? > > Do you maybe have NetworkManager still active? > > Thank you for the responses. There is no NetworkManager installed. Perhaps I should give some more info. It is a two-gateway machine. I have following lines in my rc.local: # routing and default gateway for each interface ip route add 10.0.0.0/24 dev eth0 src 10.0.0.32 table T1 ip route add default via 10.0.0.11 table T1 ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 dev eth1 src 192.168.2.2 table T2 ip route add default via 192.168.2.1 table T2 # regular routes ip route add 10.0.0.0/24 dev eth0 src 10.0.0.32 ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 dev eth1 src 192.168.2.2 # default gateway ip route add default via 10.0.0.11 # rules ip rule add from 10.0.0.32 table T1 ip rule add from 192.168.2.2 table T2 But again, the system was working before fine. The problematic interface is 192.168.2.2 (eth1). In network-scripts directory, I have 2 eth configuration files, nothing else (apart from lo of course). eth0: DEVICE="eth0" NM_CONTROLLED="yes" ONBOOT=yes HWADDR=52:54:00:E0:5A:C5 TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=none IPADDR=10.0.0.32 PREFIX=24 DNS1=127.0.0.1 #DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6INIT=no NAME="System eth0" UUID=5fb06bd0-0bb0-7ffb-45f1-d6edd65f3e03 PEERDNS=no eth1: DEVICE="eth1" NM_CONTROLLED="yes" ONBOOT=yes HWADDR=52:54:00:B5:B6:D1 TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=none IPADDR=192.168.2.2 PREFIX=24 DNS1=127.0.0.1 #DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6INIT=no NAME="System eth1" UUID=5fb06bd0-0bb0-7ffb-45f1-d6edd65f3e03 PEERDNS=no network: NETWORKING=yes NETWORKING_IPV6=no HOSTNAME=www.onart.com.tr GATEWAY=10.0.0.11 Thank you for your support. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd ethernet interface
Vreme: 11/05/2011 02:52 AM, John R Pierce piše:
> On 11/04/11 6:29 PM, Jure Pečar wrote: >> I'd recommend the same treatment for network manager as we used for sendmail >> all those years back: >> # yum -y remove NetworkManager >> >> And then configure your network the old, verified, stable and trusted way, >> by editing the ifcfg files. The whole idea of having something running on a >> *server* that can change your networks settings for whatever reason is >> horribly wrong. > > great. how do I do dhcp (client) without NetworkManager ? Most all my > lab servers are configured via DHCP reservations. > > and where IS the docs on what-all goes in ifcfg-eth0 or whatever now > days? again, the RHEL6 manuals seem to skip over these details. > Removing NetworkManager (only sane solution for server): http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking#Disabling_NetworkManager -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd ethernet interface
Am 05.11.2011 07:15, schrieb Mufit Eribol:
> On 05.11.2011 02:32, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Vreme: 11/05/2011 01:10 AM, Mufit Eribol piše: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have a CentOS 6 VM on a CentOS 6 host. This VM has two ethernet >>> interfaces, eth0 and eth1. It was working nice. All of a sudden eth1 >>> stopped working as expected. Kernel started to give the message below: Hi Mufit, renaming of interfaces most likely comes from udev rules. Find rule 70 network in /etc/udev.d/rules, it is recreated upon restart. Delete it then reboot. Maybe this helps. Rainer _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 04:26 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.