Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect
> Digimer wrote:
>> On 09/27/2011 11:01 AM, Alex Bajan wrote:
>>> Please remove the formation about RAQport it is incorrect
>> Beyond the whole "Streisand effect", you've provided no evidence that
>> these posts are wrong. Despite that, you've not put forward any cause to
>> have jurisdiction to request the removal, either.
> Furthermore, that's four years old. I haven't bothered to go there, but
> what assurance would anyone have that it was *not* correct four years ago?
> Or is this intended as a prequel to a takedown notice, in which case
> #insert FLAME_ON.h
And, following up my own post, which "formation" were you referring to, a
military formation? A rock formation? We don't have enough INformation....
mark "so, did he pass 6th grade English?"
CentOS mailing list